banning abortion and stem cell research and maybe even vasectomies(no spell checker for the details portion)
2006-07-21 07:27:16 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
well maybe not vasectomies
2006-07-21 07:45:27 · update #1
Abortion and stem cell research, yes (in that state) but not vasectomies.
2006-07-21 07:30:28 · answer #1 · answered by JTz 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. Democrats will win in 2008 (im not sure if that's good or bad). They will stop all of the no abortion bs. I'm not sure if stem cell research should be government funded, based on the fact that paying for someone to have abortion is murder to some people, but funding should be used once embroys are obtained. Even in liberal places like Germany, government funding for stem cell is in the legislative process of being stopped, just the funding. Where did you hear that vasectomies are going to be illegal?
2006-07-21 07:33:09 · answer #2 · answered by infernomanor 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont know what Scott Peterson has to do with Stem Cell, Abortion, or Vasectomies... Seriously he killed his wife and baby in cold blood for no reason other than he is a selfish bastard. He desvers to die, he dosent desver to be alive now... but that has nothing to do with any other problems our country has...
2006-07-21 07:33:43 · answer #3 · answered by Beckwith 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you know thats a good question.... I would have to say though that it wasn't voluntary as abortions or vasectomies are... especially since Lacy had every intention to carry the baby to full term.
2006-07-21 07:33:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because an unborn toddler IS a human existence in spite of each and every thing! satisfied some regulation finally acknowledges that certainty. What i do not realize is how, after this homicide conviction, all and sundry else can ever get away with killing an unborn newborn legally. (pretty partial- start abortions.)
2016-11-25 00:25:28 · answer #5 · answered by giraldo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The baby's natural birth was due, and the baby would have lived outside the mother with regular care. The baby could have been saved and adopted. He didn't want either to survive. He killed both mother and child.
2006-07-21 07:44:02 · answer #6 · answered by craigrr929 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand how it is murder of the unborn baby in a case like that, but them abortion is not murder. The unborn baby dies either way.
2006-07-21 07:32:16 · answer #7 · answered by Kelly B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly. Making the murder of unborn babies illegal is something I don't want to see happen either. I also like it when experiments are done on unborn babies.
I also think that instead of doing make testing and drug testing on cute animals, we should do it on retarded people. Either than or euthanise them.
2006-07-21 07:34:02 · answer #8 · answered by Arthur M 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he will be charged with murder of stacey but im not sure about the baby
2006-07-21 07:33:49 · answer #9 · answered by <3 Jessie <3 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No-he is guilty and hes getting what he deserves!
2006-07-21 07:30:53 · answer #10 · answered by redirishactress 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋