Is it because Syria and iran are too strong that Israel launches her war on Lebanon for the second time once in 1982 and now in 2006? does it have a complicit agreement with Syria to wage their wars on Lebanon's grounds?
2006-07-21 07:23:37 · 19 answers · asked by kitty 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Israel and Syria never fight, it seems the poor civilian Lebanese have always to pay the price of their crimes . Lebanon has just built its country after 17 years of civil war,, now Israel is destroying it again pretending to kill a terrorist organisation, Israel invasion to Lebanon in 1982 to kill the palestinians paved the way for hezbollah to exist with the help of syrian and iranian arms, today Israel invasion of Lebanon would pave the way to wish organisation, God only knows!
2006-07-21 08:19:46 · answer #1 · answered by fuschiafish 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Syria wouldn't be a threat without Iran...so the real question is why doesn't Israel fight Iran too. Here are a few reasons:
1. It's easier to fight 1 war at a time. The goal is to weaken/destroy Hezbollah and to recover kidnapped soldiers. For now, fighting Iran directly doesn't help to achieve these goals.
2. The world would cry foul since no missiles were launched from Iran.
3. The U.S. is better equipped to handle Iran.
2006-07-21 07:30:17 · answer #2 · answered by Brand X 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the attacks came from Southern Lebanon. They just want to live in peace - as displayed by their following the requirements to return land to the Lebanon & Gaza. Then they are backstabbed by Hezbollah & Hamas - which is there enemy. Give the Lebanon war a little time - Syria & Iran will feel reprecussions for financing and suppling those terrorist.
2006-07-21 07:29:36 · answer #3 · answered by therandman 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They're attacking Hezbollah, whose hq happens to be in Lebanon, and not Lebanon itself. They have no ground to go after Iran or Syria. And for the Lebanese government I wouldn't say they "support" Hezbollah -- they're in a tough spot and out of all people they would want this to stop the most.
2006-07-21 07:30:33 · answer #4 · answered by Aurora 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i might definately accept as true with propose face right here, the exterior supporters of the two sides upon Israel and Iran might create drastic repercussions in the time of the full worldwide community. Iran continuously utilizing in addition upsetting approaches of alternative international locations inclusive of North Korea, and leaders inclusive of Chavez continuously attempt to tempt and provoke international locations like the U.S. and Israel. lran has been attempting to do some thing with a inhabitants that at the instant does not help the regime in potential (almost over 80% of the present inhabitants are between the a protracted time of 20-early 30's) for this reason they immediately discovered by examples like the present protests that basically utilizing stress won't benefit administration of its youthful/and massive majority of the inhabitants. As to the guy who reported Israel does not be waiting to grant an prompt and and prompt adequate blow to Iran even nonetheless there is persevered hypothesis right here and the no longer likely-hood of an Israel attack- i might ask if all people right here recollects the six day warfare ( yup speaking approximately while Israel went to warfare with a brilliant majority of the middle eastern states of -Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, and numerous different states in the time of the middle east that supported the warfare against Israel- following the top results of the warfare Israel gained rather a lot of continuously disputed land alongside with- Sinai, Gaza strip, Golan Heights, aspects of Jersualem and the west monetary agency. One might desire the transforming into escalations does not circulate so some distance to bring about an entire out warfare, yet looking back upon history unsure if thats a danger Israel and Netanyahu are prepared to take once you have somone like Ahmadinejad in potential (the comparable guy who denied the holocaust ever happend and the comparable guy who promised to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, and the comparable guy who has yet to truly be met with any genuine or devastating sanctions via the U.S. or different international locations even nonetheless we've heard plenty rhetoric from the present admin. in this)
2016-10-08 04:17:46 · answer #5 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You wage war when you are in position to win, otherwise you do politics.
I do not see any need to attack Syria, but Iran can be a target if he continues with its nuclear program.
Syria can be dealt thru cold /spy/ war.
It seems that everyone think now when Israel attacked Hezballah that they will attack all other parties involved, but only if Iran and Syria go into play with military, they you could see atacks on Syrian and Iranian soil, and against their forces.
You only have a chance to win a war when all the faktors are under you control, and you have a supremacy of war power.
Otherwise you have war of atrition, which is not very benefitial if you dont mind spending your army .
But I think that Israeli like Patton wont the other poor bastard to die for their country, not you for yours.
2006-07-21 07:34:05 · answer #6 · answered by haruvatu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's because Hezbollah were directly responsible for the rockets, killings and kidnappings along Israel's northern border.
If Syria and/or Iran takes direct military action to support Hamas or Hezbollah, then Israel may respond in kind plus some.
2006-07-21 07:28:42 · answer #7 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lebanon has given shelter to the Hezbollah leaders. If they had minded, they could have given the Hezbollah leaders along with the 2 soldiers to Israel and avoided this war. It is their mistake. And so Israel is showing her mussle to Lebanon. Under stood?
2006-07-21 07:29:46 · answer #8 · answered by Electric 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, because the Hezbollah operates out of Lebanon. The countries who support them won't let them operate out of their countries. They knew Israel would attack at some point and they didn't want it to be them. That's why!!
2006-07-21 07:27:07 · answer #9 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel will do whatever it takes to remove the thrones one by one. The closest and the easiest (or so they thought) would be hezbollah.
Our great government lead by the greatest mind in history (Bush -in case u didn't know) is a slave for Israel. They plan, we provide the cover.
2006-07-21 08:10:20 · answer #10 · answered by Mas S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋