English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When invaded by another country and your country has no real army or money for wepons, what are acceptable methods of defense? If the two armies are put head to head in conventional warfare you know you'd lose. Are Smart bombs, suicide bombs, shooting an accasional rocket ok? What is?

2006-07-21 06:40:49 · 8 answers · asked by Adam H 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

8 answers

That is why the US has the right to bear arms. The founding fathers intended it for that situation. However, I would assume that then invading country wouldn't like it too much.

2006-07-21 06:44:05 · answer #1 · answered by Blunt Honesty 7 · 1 0

in this situation one must resort to guerilla tactics. technologically inferior forces can do nothing to stop smart bombs or guided rockets. instead they must hit and run. suicide bombers are the most effective method since there is no way to detect or stop them. they're hell bent on dying for whatever cause so there's no negotiating with them. either kill them or they kill you. pretty much anything goes at that point. if the US were invaded and we had their resources, we'd be doing the same thing basically. not suicide bombing but guerilla tactics. the key to winning this way is to frustrate the enemy into giving up. not by killing through sheer numbers. break down the enemy's will to fight by hitting them when they least expect and running away so they cannot fire back. you get to stay on top while the enemy is constantly on guard.

2006-07-21 06:47:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. If Israel invades, all is fair. Hezbollah was formed in reaction to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon the last time. Are they really thinking that another invasion will get rid of Hezbollah? But hey, no one ever learns anyways.

2006-07-21 06:45:28 · answer #3 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 0 0

Yes

2006-07-21 06:45:49 · answer #4 · answered by Ahmad 4 · 0 0

the u . s . a . did not invade Iraq. we are implementing int'l agreements by using utilising tension. Iraq agreed to persist with specific UN mandates and did not, so we and distinctive different worldwide places made them do what they have been think to do. So is going with Hezbolah. Israel complied with their agreements, no person else did. the US and Israel are the best men.

2017-01-03 03:22:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You start a war you should be totally destroyed .Islam started there terror in the 1970's and should be totally exterminated for it

2006-07-21 06:42:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That depends on what caused the conflict.

2006-07-21 06:44:17 · answer #7 · answered by DannyK 6 · 0 0

all fair in love and WAR

2006-07-21 06:47:02 · answer #8 · answered by HEY boo boo 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers