http://www.asis.com/~stag/uspres.html look at the very bottom of this page is a family tree proving that many of our presidents all descend from the same royal bloodline.this is a christian website and many things on here i dont agree with. what i do agree with is the fact that our votes dont count and all of our presidents have been pre determined thousands of years ago as part of a plan for overt global control by a force that seeks to consume the entire stream of human energy. these people are puppets for the worst evil we could ever know as naturally loving creatures. stop letting these governments rape our children and consume our souls.
2006-07-21 05:41:27 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You are correct about the bloodlines. You wouldn't think a "Democratic" society would just by chance nominate and vote for the same family?? .................. Its hard to make people aware of these facts when you go off the deep end with all that soul consuming human energy stuff. You might as well have included UFO's, black helicopters, and Bigfoot in your details. You have effectively turned people away from the issue by your use of language. For the rest reading this answer the bloodline thing is true, check it out.
2006-07-21 06:20:14 · answer #1 · answered by captpcb216 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ummmm... what? If you go back far enough, you can say you're related to just about everybody -- a solid 10% of all of Asia can claim genetic heritage to Genghis Khan, but it's not as if there are 2 million hairy conquerors wandering around Asia, plundering and pillaging the countryside. Same go with our presidents; especially in the beginning, a lot of the original colonists were descended in one way or another from the royal bloodline (those ancillary earls and dukes whose second or third or seventh sons didn't inherit squat and had to actually work for a living), so the possibility that a number of our presidents are distantly related to royalty is no small stretch. It's more a factor of the kind of person the American people choose to vote for -- so far, they've all been white, only one wasn't a Protestant (Kennedy was Catholic), and because it costs a lots to run for President, they all tended to be relatively wealthy (with a few exceptions). Your vote does count, just not much -- you have to average it with the other 50-100 million votes that get tallied and sent to the electoral college for the final vote.
As for your conspiracy theory... I don't think the royal family's involved. Try the Skulls or Masons; they're shadier.
2006-07-21 05:54:31 · answer #2 · answered by theyuks 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama who's a criminal specialist and went to the perfect regulation college contained in the rustic takes the structure very heavily. the quote you've given does no longer talk about what he thinks ought to ensue yet is his evaluation of the warren court. and that i imagine his evaluation that the structure says what the state can't do to you, and it doesn't say that a lot about what the federal authorities ought to do for you. Obama also doesn't like the concept of courts placing public coverage. i imagine he may quite the legislator ascertain gay marriage and abortion rights and affirmative action. He thinks that if you're for any of those issues or carry anyplace on any coverage, you're better served operating to get the legislator to amend the guidelines then attempting to rigidity your opinion on others by potential of a court determination. Obama has no longer been very forceful in filling his court appointments he has spent no political capitol on them. Obama's monetary coverage is likewise hardly for the redistribution of wealth, his rules have helped those which have money make better and those that do not, properly he's conscious it isn't basic for us and he feels our soreness. an similar those who ran the Bush monetary coverage run the Obama monetary coverage.
2016-12-02 01:31:02 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Power likes to keep it in the family.
2006-07-21 05:44:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
.
The first evil is not being able to recognize what is real, and what is conspiracy-theory-based insanity.
Please purge yourself of your evil.
.
2006-07-21 05:50:40 · answer #5 · answered by robabard 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're a "koo koo bird" and a yo-yo
2006-07-21 05:50:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you a koo-koo bird
2006-07-21 05:45:38 · answer #7 · answered by double0negitive 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋