2006-07-21 05:06:49 · 18 answers · asked by ? 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Yup, would get my whole body tattooed :)
2006-07-21 05:10:03 · answer #1 · answered by JAngel 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A tattoo is barely everlasting because it truly is injected less than the exterior of the exterior, it has no longer some thing to do with the really ink used. In theory you may tattoo your self with any ink (see you later because it hasn't were given any lead in it). So the reply is until eventually the ink is going less than the exterior then it heavily isn't everlasting.
2016-11-25 00:15:29 · answer #2 · answered by studdard 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah. Then I could actually get a job at a good company in 36 months. I'll be eligible to work anyway.
2006-07-21 05:10:45 · answer #3 · answered by Lord Rupert Everton 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I do have a tattoo and would like others but think I would also like to have ones that I could "change" every few years.
2006-07-21 05:10:10 · answer #4 · answered by Elle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-07-21 05:09:05 · answer #5 · answered by starr 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, after I saw convincing evidence that it was safe and that it really disappeared completely after 36 months in everyone who tried it.
2006-07-21 05:09:41 · answer #6 · answered by cucumberlarry1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So many more questions... How about scaring, none? No visible evidence that the tatoo WAS there? If no, then YES!
2006-07-21 05:10:11 · answer #7 · answered by ♥Saffire♥ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, I did get an airbrush one that lasted 6 days...It was a green sea turtle!
2006-07-21 05:25:05 · answer #8 · answered by Leroy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. If I'm going to mark my body, it has to be for something important, and I'd like it to stay.
2006-07-21 05:10:00 · answer #9 · answered by ashdyann3 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as long as it was legal and safe...yes. I don't have or want any tatoos, but i would re-consider if it wasn't life-time permanent.
2006-07-21 05:11:29 · answer #10 · answered by melissa c 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋