Would you be willing to give up TV for 5 years if it meant someone would provide for 1,000 starving children?
2006-07-21 05:00:12 · 8 answers · asked by Imani 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
to prevent a bombardment of questions.. you are not allowed to watch TV ANYWHERE.. and those 1,000 children would have anything they dreamed of .. until they were 18
2006-07-21 05:05:41 · update #1
yes i'm not that selfish the only I thing I really watch on tv is music video's and AI whenever it's on.
2006-07-21 06:59:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
CNN's total topic at present changed into damaged authorities. i'm no longer confident its fairly damaged or no matter if it is because of costs the democrats have positioned forth which incorporates the health care, cap and commerce, the stimulus, and the large funds very last twelve months that Republicans will obviously be antagonistic to. i'd wager from the kind of homestead and Senate contributors who're retiring that lots of them heavily isn't returning after the subsequent election. pay interest intently even as those who're retiring are interviewed. they offer the most honest solutions.
2016-11-25 00:13:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way. There are just some shows I could not give up watching.
2006-07-21 05:12:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not heartless but...no..I know no one would do it for me so I have to be selfish and say no..Let the rich folks and government take care of them like they do the ones now..oh they dont?hmmm..odd.
2006-07-21 05:14:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope. i would rather donate $5000, then my 5 years.
2006-07-21 05:04:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i would
2006-07-21 06:14:29 · answer #6 · answered by recmcmdc 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure ... but don't you dare touch my computer!!!
2006-07-21 05:11:10 · answer #7 · answered by ♪ Nickels ♪ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't even have cable
2006-07-21 05:17:27 · answer #8 · answered by veryberry 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋