If time travel unwravels itself like everything else. There is a medium at the center of everything we are all composed of dust and ash. So instead of moving something at the speed of light. We could refract then reflect the acceleration and at the point within the centripical boundry. Inside that curve we would then have to find a way to super re-impose our molecules of dust and ash. Sub-atomic particles might move that fast. So we could slide along the time scale. If and when we find a way to purify light itself. I think you can only slide one way down the scale. To slide back might erase your previous existance and history and the last known scale would indeed become the newest scale.
2006-07-21 04:39:55 · 9 answers · asked by Thin King 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
take a break my friend and if u find continuous disorder of thoughts and logic believe me its time to seek a professional help.
2006-07-21 05:19:08 · answer #1 · answered by mukesh padhya 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
While it's cool that you think such deep thoughts (the world needs deep thinkers), it just might be time to take a break for a while and go shoot hoops with the guys. Time travel has been investigated for over 100 years, and I don't think there's any way to actually do it. It's like nailing Jell-O to the wall. You can do lots of things to get it there, but eventually it will fall. Besides, time travel is dangerous. It's like allowing some of these radical countries to play with nuclear bombs. Someone always has an agenda to use their toy to their own advantage, not considering what it will do to those around them. As with all science, everything needs to be considered, especially the worst case scenario. Just because it does some good for a few doesn't mean it's good for all. I think I'd let that one alone and focus on something that will help everyone. But, for now, go play ball! <*)))><
2006-07-21 11:49:34 · answer #2 · answered by Sandylynn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In order to travel through time, it requires 1.21 gigawatts (GW) of electricity, originally supplied by a plutonium-powered nuclear reactor. Also, the De Lorean needs to be travelling at 88 mph (141.6 km/h), which is achieved by its gasoline powered internal combustion engine. During its first two trips (one minute forward in time, and back in time to 1955) the combination was used without incident. However, during its next trip (back to 1985), plutonium was not available, so a lightning rod was connected directly to the flux capacitor and was used while the vehicle sustained 88 mph. Plutonium was used once again for a trip forward in time at least 30 years, and at some point thereafter the plutonium reactor was replaced by a "Mr. Fusion" home energy generator from the future that was fueled by extracting hydrogen atoms from garbage.
2006-07-21 11:47:20 · answer #3 · answered by sfredbook 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Time is not a continuum; it's a construct of the human world.
2006-07-21 11:43:14 · answer #4 · answered by relentless_behaviour 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Over thinkin things ?
2006-07-21 11:42:43 · answer #5 · answered by The Hit Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Except that you forgot to take into account that all time is relative...and therefore so are you.
2006-07-21 11:44:59 · answer #6 · answered by rahkokwee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Time is how you look at it.
2006-07-21 12:04:11 · answer #7 · answered by goring 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And your point is?
2006-07-21 11:46:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i have studied theoretical physics and you don't seem to know wtf you're talking about
2006-07-21 11:42:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋