They think their way is the only right way, so they think that entitles them to be the police of the world.
2006-07-21 04:31:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by ConcernedCitizen 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the ultimate goal in any conflict is to survive. You will have to strike first if war is unavoidable for a greater chance to survive. Look at Japan, they are to pre-emptive strike the North Korea over the Missile test if U.N don't act on it fast enough. Do you want to die a good guy? And don't say only Conservatives believe in it, Liberals too. Go ask around.
2006-07-21 04:55:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by shshht 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
of route it is not ok.. Thats part of their doctrine which rather a lot parallels fascism. the following is a definition by using Republican candidate Ron Paul extra major than the names of folk affiliated with neo-conservatism are the perspectives they adhere to. the following is a short precis of the final expertise of what neocons believe: a million. They consider Trotsky on everlasting revolution, violent to boot as psychological. 2. they're for redrawing the map of the middle East and are prepared to apply rigidity to take action. 3. they think in preemptive warfare to achieve wanted ends. 4. They settle for the concept the ends justify the skill—that hardball politics is an ethical necessity. 5. They exhibit no competition to the welfare state. 6. they don't look bashful about an American empire; instead they strongly propose it. 7. they think mendacity is critical for the state to live to inform the tale. 8. they think a sensible federal authorities is a income. 9. they think pertinent info about how a society must be run must be held by using the elite and withheld from those who do no longer have the braveness to manage it. 10. they think neutrality in overseas affairs is unwell counseled. 11. They carry Leo Strauss in severe esteem. 12. they think imperialism, if modern in nature, is acceptable. 13. making use of American may to rigidity American beliefs on others is appropriate. rigidity might want to no longer be constrained to the protection of our u . s .. 14. 9-11 resulted from the shortcoming of overseas entanglements, no longer from too many. 15. They dislike and despise libertarians (therefore, a similar applies to all strict constitutionalists.) 16. They propose assaults on civil liberties, along with those stumbled on interior the Patriot Act, as being needed. 17. They unconditionally help Israel and function an huge alliance with the Likud social gathering.
2016-10-15 01:16:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am conservative I do not believe in pre-emptive war unless it cannot be avoided if someone is attacking our country then we have to attack back and defend our country
2006-07-21 04:31:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by valgal115 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do you want to wait for the sucker punch? Unlike you and your kind I did not enjoy the events or aftermath of 911. It is also called part of the real world, david. See most business people try to be PROACTIVE and anticipate upcoming events and be able to handle them RATHER than having to REACT to them. A proactive business makes more money and has a better reputation that a reactive company. The same with govt - a proactive govt can protect its citizens much better than a reactive govt.
2006-07-21 04:41:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by therandman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because FDR believed in talking to Japan on December 6, 1941.
Because Neville Chamberlain got "Peace in our times" in 1938.
2006-07-21 04:36:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by SPLATT 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the previous admin's "look the other way" tactics got us 9-11 and missles in N Korea and Iran.
2006-07-21 04:30:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by obviously_you'renotagolfer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It has been a popular idea among conservatives because it worked so well for Germany & Japan
2006-07-21 04:31:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the current Administration convinced them that is was a good Idea. They would have never thought of it before they were told.
2006-07-21 04:30:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by DEEJay 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lawyers are more apt to strike first. if you have ever been sued you know that the law seems to favor the guy doing the suing vs the defendant. Not fair just true.
Conservatives (lawyer-types) they can't help themselves.
2006-07-21 04:35:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by dhebert244 3
·
0⤊
0⤋