With all the new evidence and testimony, do you finally get that Iraq needed to be invaded?
2006-07-21 04:25:07 · 6 answers · asked by carolinagrl 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Slow down "Caesar"! One country at a time man!
2006-07-21 05:17:09 · update #1
It wasn't invaded, its occupied, there's a difference. Occupation occurs with approval, invasion is just a military punch in the face.
I haven't retracted my feelings, I never will. I understand and appreciate what happened and what good its doing for those citizens in the long run, do you think that the Reovlutionary War wasn't bloody and a bit messy?
2006-07-21 04:31:14 · answer #1 · answered by illustrat_ed_designs 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If we (America) went into Iraq because we thought they were a threat having weapons of mass destruction (why) haven't we invaded Iran and North Korea? This is a Bush war and nothing else, and Americans are dieing every day fighting for a country unwilling to take the lead against terrorism in their country. Bush has taken our country down a dead-end -road.
2006-07-21 11:37:01 · answer #2 · answered by Caesar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you have changed your mind, you dishonor the sacrifices of our brave service men and women. Go to "to our veterans".
2006-07-21 11:31:20 · answer #3 · answered by lighthouse 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah i do get it.People like you and you,need help.
2006-07-21 11:31:09 · answer #4 · answered by Leprechaun 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oil
2006-07-21 11:28:39 · answer #5 · answered by littlebylittle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Always did .
Thanks for posting it .
2006-07-21 11:29:38 · answer #6 · answered by Elaine814 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋