what kind of government leader ship do we have if the best we can offer is rice.A euorpean studies expert and author maybe but she has no clue what the middle east is about .WOMEN have no rights in these countrys lol .
SO what will she do . WITH no respect how does she gain barginning power with the worlds master's in negotiation .
2006-07-21 04:10:10 · 11 answers · asked by playtoofast 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh Hell no!
All she is is a stall. W doesn't want to stop the Israeli's. He wants them to keep attacking for a couple of reasons.
First, it keeps the news coverage out of Iraq where in the last couple of months over 600 civilians have been murdered. Can anyone say "Civil war" or "Total failure"?
Second, by letting Israel pound Lebonon it creates more hatred and terrorist so W can claim he needs to cut more civil liberties at home to fight terrorism.
If anyone thinks he is really concerned about fighting terrorism, then you haven't been reading between the lines. His lips move but lies come out. It's all about control of the worlds oil and taking power in the USA.
2006-07-21 04:25:37 · answer #1 · answered by Imaginer 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i'd start up in Darfur before going to the middle East. it is a good higher problem. And sure, Obama ought to negotiate some thing, the guy is an truly experienced flesh presser and speaker, jogs my memory of a wise Ronald Reagan, no longer the Alzheimer's, Iran-Contra, Ollie North version.
2016-12-02 01:24:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Our government is definitely lacking both leadership and direction. Rice may not be able to broker a peace agreement but she's all we got. George Bush has been a plague on our country for nearly eight years, we deserve better. Unfortunately there's little to choose from in the next election. Americans need to get involved and informed and stop this stupid act of voting along party lines. Just look where this has got us.
2006-07-21 04:27:57 · answer #3 · answered by Caesar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is a great decision. She is well-informed and very level-headed. While women in those countries have no rights, she is an AMERICAN so she does have rights. Maybe a woman doing the negotiating just might teach them a thing or two!
2006-07-21 04:14:25 · answer #4 · answered by Tangled Web 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure that Dr. Rice (whose credentials are probably 5 orders of magnitude better than anyone's on Y!A) is already talking to leaders around the world on this issue.
Unfortunitely, in order for her to be heard the parties involved must be willing to listen. At least two of them aren't listening to anyone but their hatred.
2006-07-21 04:16:44 · answer #5 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A woman is the very best person to have there. She is one of the smartest people in government, and we really dont need to have our government representatives be dictated by terrorists or others who can't seem to understand that women are not property.
2006-07-21 04:14:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
who said is bush want peace in the region, all they want military adverturist is a global conflict that military arms to be used in killing than american food to feed the hungry
2006-07-21 04:16:02 · answer #7 · answered by lepactodeloupes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this question is a very bitter pill for me, and I agree with your statements, BUT, yes, she'll go and do her best and what she's been briefed to do, its her job and her duty to go. but lets keep in mind also the people she's meeting are NOT dummies and they know she speaks for the US.
2006-07-21 04:14:52 · answer #8 · answered by sealss3006 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here's a clue.
YOU CAN'T NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS.
2006-07-21 04:13:53 · answer #9 · answered by schillinfl2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course. That's her job!
2006-07-21 04:14:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋