Due to his war on the middle east and the fact that the man cant even talk right, how long before we can officially consider him a lame duck? He has not done one great thing since he has been in office besides starting a never ending war or "conflict" in the middle east.
2006-07-21 04:00:14 · 18 answers · asked by str8stroke 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I hate it when people say we need to wipe out the terrorists like you will ever be able to stop them. Its just like drug dealers, you take one out and another one steps up. This is the same thing with the terrorists, you will NEVER get rid of them, NEVER. We have terrorists living in the USA, have you ever heard of the KKK?? You will always have bad people in the world no matter what you try to do. You can say lets fight them over there but is that really fair to the women and children of those countries? They have been living in the **** for many years and you think thats right? You think we have stopped them from anything, hell they are still fighting and fighting, how many years will it take? You think if we stay over there for 10 years that terrorists will just up and stop and there will be no more of them? We have many people in america that are the same way, look at columbine and that kids diary, he planned to take a plane and crash it in New York and this was before sept 11.
2006-07-21 04:39:00 · update #1
Officially, after the results of the 2008 election are final and the new president's transition office reports to the White House.
2006-07-21 04:11:26 · answer #1 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The current War in Lebanon is the beginning of George W. Bush's lame duckness. It is a horrible reality to witness an American President whose leadership has caused him and the United States to be a non-factor in this current war in the Middle East.
Bush has unskillfully mislead the American people into an untenable position in the Middle East. We have not only lost face or standing but we have exposed our hole card, and now we no longer have Israel as a foil to keep the guerrilla forces at bay.
This current escalation began with a Hamas's calculated attack and capture of a single Jewish soldier in or around the Gaze.
This attack was followed by Hezbollah capturing two more of Israel's soldiers. The guerrilla's certainly seemed to have known what Israel's response would be and are now playing Israel like a Arabian flute.
It is no small accomplishment to knock the United States out of any effective leadership role and attrack the worlds condemnation and pleading to stop the war before something worse happens.
But, no one is listening in Israel, and no one cares what Bush is doing because whatever he does will be wrong.
2006-07-21 04:31:27 · answer #2 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
January 20, 2008
2006-07-21 04:03:30 · answer #3 · answered by Pobept 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
let me start by saying I don't like Bush(President). However where would you rather have the WAR on terror fought? Here on our homeland in America or over in The middle east??? The President before Bush had the opportunity to take out Osama and he Chicken shitted up!! plain and simple!! this President(BUSH) had the chance to really make a mark against Terrorism and he Chicken shitted up!! I believe it is because of all the bleeding hearts and liberals in this country! They wont allow our military to fight this war properly and do what it takes to wipe these freeks out!!! so BLAME THE BLEEDING HEARTS AND THE LIBERALS FOR THE crap state this country is in! Not the President!! The crappy senate and congress are also FU#$ing up as well!!
Lame Duck?? don't really see it! Sorry
2006-07-21 04:11:24 · answer #4 · answered by slyone40068 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I surely have each expectation that Iran will galvanize a strike or commence up one on Israeli's or Iraqi's. It has no longer some thing to do with President Bush, it has each little thing to do with retaining the sane part of the international from nuclear attack. Which part of the international are you in, again? imagine for a 2d. Why did Iran attempt missiles Monday? Why did Iran throw out nuclear inspectors and refuse them get admission to Monday? Why did Iranian papers promote suicide assaults antagonistic to the united states this week? Why does the Iranian chief experience he has the right to nuclear guns even as the international is easily-known with finished nicely he intends to apply them on the united states or Israel? Why might want to Iran be allowed to have nukes, that they and N Korea have both been covertly and illegally engaged on for 8 yrs? Why did Pakistans nuclear specialist promote Iran and N Korea nuclear secrets and techniques and why didnt Pakistan prosecute him?
2016-10-15 01:13:55 · answer #5 · answered by may 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The term for Lame Duck is applied to a president who can not be re-elected because he's all ready served two terms.
Do some home work first.
2006-07-21 04:03:17 · answer #6 · answered by wildbill05733 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At least as long as it's taking for Clinton to be officially considered a lame duck .
2006-07-21 04:18:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
One SECOND before he leaves office. I believe he will keep on doing what he believes is right upto the end of his term. You just watch! I have great respect for his views, his actions and his convictions. Wish half of the morons who insult him with mindless guttertalk had the same.
2006-07-21 04:04:38 · answer #8 · answered by paanbahar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has been a lame duck since he stole his first election.
2006-07-21 04:06:13 · answer #9 · answered by Dennis C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are right such an idiot like him shouldn't be in the white house that makes America looks stupid.i think he should go back to his farm in Texas looking after the cows there.
2006-07-21 04:16:15 · answer #10 · answered by remo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋