English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

The divining right of kings look it up not the game but the expression/

Hey i was a king once.

2006-07-21 04:12:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Philosophically or practically common folklore were no more interested in the term Royal.....so even after total non-existence of royal rule from most of the nations, there is still feeling of burden among those believe in Royalty......so philosophically its their bread and butter to think whether royalty may support the burden of royalty or otherwise.

2006-07-21 08:16:57 · answer #2 · answered by indraraj22 4 · 0 0

It's like the Sword in the Stone story. If royalty were determined by whether somebody could support royalty, then I guess only those who were true of heart could pull Excalibur from the stone. Or it means that only royalty has enough money to pay for a royal lifestyle. Man, do they spend some dough! If they're building castles, I guess they have to be royal to get the money and taxes and support from their loyal subjects to support their lifestyle. We peasants don't have what it takes to support their burdensome lifestyle unless we all pull together for the sake of our royals.

2006-07-24 13:31:08 · answer #3 · answered by SlowClap 6 · 0 0

Perhaps this is about only those of the pure bloodline of the so called gods can be considered royalty. Gods slept with the daughers of man and are direct decendants of the Alien creaters. Because of this they deem themselves rulers of the rest of man by default. Learn why royalty is what it is and that may help you

2006-07-21 04:04:29 · answer #4 · answered by commonxsense2005 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers