thank u for your post and for seeing my point im sick of people saying how much muslims are terrorists and bad people when look at what israel is doing, and they had lebanese people kidnapped before hezbollah took the 2 soldiers. Because Israel wants to control that whole area and they cant they have to share it, you may not like your neighbors but you cant kill them!
2006-07-21 03:46:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'm quite happy Israel take this "firm" stance - it will invite the "holy warriors" down to the Lebanon to have a go at killing their most hated infidel (the Jew) and so remove at lest some of them from Iraq, Afghan etc.
With a bit of luck the Israelis will roll over Lebanon and then have a go at the Syrians and then the Iranians. After all these are the two countries who contribute most to worldwide terror.
Ah wishful thinking - but you have to admire the Israelis refusal to listen to anyone ever. For them its about their own country and screw the rest. If only we were a little more like that in some respects
2006-07-21 03:45:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by diab963 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you need to pay more attention to what's going on in the Middle East. You are spouting false information. Israel is not bombing Canadians, Americans, French, Brits,etc. And they wouldn't have to bomb residential neighborhoods in Lebanon if Hezbollah had not parked their rocket and missile launchers there. Hezbollah has been killing innocent Israelis for too long. Israel is just fighting back, defending its country and its people.
2006-07-21 04:03:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by celticwoman777 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who the hell are the Jewish mafia supposed to be? Are they supposed to be all connected or something? Have you been to Israel? Most of the time they are far too busy arguing with eachother to argue with anyone else. Israel is not a terrorist organisation- they didn't start this mess with the Lebanon. And it has nothing to do with any so-called Jewish Mafia. It's because they are ALL COMPLETELY NUTS.
2006-07-21 03:41:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by big_fat_goth 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Jews do no longer favor each of the land interior the middle East. i comprehend of no Jewish mainstream team that has ever stated this or indicated this. compared to their adversaries in Hamas, Hezbollah, or the country of Iran who favor the completed state of Israel minus very the vast majority of their Jews (i do no longer placed the mainstream Palestinian Authority and Arab international locations along with Saudi Arabia in the following which have persistently stated that they can settle for Israel interior its sixty seven borders), there aren't any mainstream (if any) Jewish communities who favor to take all Arab lands from the "Tigris to the Nile". besides the actuality that in the adventure that they needed to attempt this, such an occupation may be no longer plausible for them to do. A u . s . of six million Jews can not actual "take" the territory of two hundred million Arabs. They Jews initially needed the completed part of the Palestinian mandate (west of the Jordan River) promised to them by using the Balfour assertion which they under no circumstances were given after the first international warfare, besides the actuality that the Arabs did get the state of Transjordan which, in surely, changed into the jap part of the Palestinian Mandate. The Jews in many situations going on the 1947 50/50 partition of jap Palestine by using the United international locations, even although the final public of the land changed into ineffective wilderness interior the Negev, even although that left them with 15% of the unique mandate of Palestine. The Arabs rejected this, and declared warfare on the Jewish State in 1947 with the said purpose of genocide (the time period "making use of the Jews" into the sea changed into used persistently in the course of the Arab international). the final public of Jews on the prompt in Israel and out of doors desire a frustrating go back to the 1967 borders with a introduction of a Palestinian state besides them. notwithstanding, except the Palestinians settle for the Jewish nature of Israel, this can not ensue. No Palestinian chief has yet stated that they are prepared to barter the "accurate of go back" of five million "refugees" even although only four hundred,000 fled in 1947. So, the warfare keeps, and lies like the single above only help to proceed the horror that many Palestinians stay in on the prompt.
2016-10-15 01:13:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by may 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes and no. In war there are civilian casualties on all sides. I think you will find Israel and Lebanon were living side by side in reasonable harmony. The Hezbollah then destroyed it with the help of Iran and Syria. So who are the real terrorists.
2006-07-21 03:43:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by deadly 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hey Celticwoman777
"Members of the Al-Akhrass family say 10 relatives, including nine Canadians were killed Sunday when Israeli forces bombed Aitaroun, a village in southern Lebanon. Foreign Affairs has confirmed that eight Canadians died.
"
Source: http://www.canada.com/news/story.html?id=b2cb54dd-72e7-45d3-9fbd-18d546d2af62
2006-07-21 04:24:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is a war zone with explosives being thrown both ways. Don't allow your predjudices to cloud the issue.
2006-07-21 03:44:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stammerman! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
http://fromisraeltolebanon.info/
Do you think the Israeli military response inside Lebanon is justified?
Yes 44% 451124 votes
No 56% 572822 votes
Total: 1023946 votes
http://edition.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/results/26119.exclude.html
2006-07-21 03:40:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by zaaterah 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
such a simple question, if only the solutions were as easy as this.
Neither side can be happy with the current position but which will back down first?
2006-07-21 03:44:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by chopchop 2
·
0⤊
0⤋