2006-07-21 03:18:21 · 16 answers · asked by Rodney 2 in Sports ➔ Olympics
For a few reasons. First, it violates the rules of the sport and many other laws. Next, it goes against the purity of sport, "the better man wins", not the better man on "drugs." Finally, it gives people a distinct and unfair advantage against others who may lack access to such things or better yet, don't wish to be a guinea pig for sport scientists...
Frankly, you wanting to see a 5.0 100m is irrelevant
2006-07-21 05:01:56 · answer #1 · answered by chairman_of_the_bored_04 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with welsh_darkhorse. There should be 2 separate Olympics one for "natural" athletes and one for drugged up athletes. Lets see just how far and how fast a human being can go when taking enhancement drugs. I dont see anything wrong with it because the athletes are adults and can make their own decisions, they know the risks so let them take the drugs and let them compete but only against other "enhanced" athletes.
2006-07-21 03:33:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
espresso, espresso, and best of all, OCCS Estes' Kona espresso from DesRon31 presented to the OX branch of united statesKitty Hawk 1996-ninety seven WestPac. Bless ya Senior chief !! heavily although, flying the SH-60B for the time of wilderness take care of/typhoon we did have the alternative of taking some prescribed stimulants from the flight health practitioner. All prescribed and accounted for... we opted out although. Operation GoldenFlow (drug urinalysis) will %. up damned close to at least some thing... you probably did not self-medicate EVER... Sudafed for a cold ought to coach as Meth !! so that you wade through the document.
2016-10-15 01:12:54 · answer #3 · answered by may 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a great SNL skit about the steroid Olympics.. I wish I knew how to find it..
but listen, drugs have serious bad effects.. its illegal because they are trying to protect athletes from killing themselves.. If steroids were perfectly safe and nothing bad happened if you took them, then they would be called vitamins..
It would still be cool to see a person breaking 5 secs, but lets not give him recognition for killing himself.
2006-07-21 04:33:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it would be who had the best scientist in there camp rather than who is actually the naturally fastest man on earth!
It would no longer be a sport but an experiment!
2006-07-21 03:24:01 · answer #5 · answered by Macka 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Start up the drug using Olympics it will be awesome to smash records. It is still breaking boundaries of human achievement
2006-07-21 03:29:22 · answer #6 · answered by welsh_darkhorse 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what ... cos its the Drug ..not the person running... get real .
Im 40 ..i smoke and drink and can still do 100m in under 11 sec..!
nuff said.
2006-07-21 03:27:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Damned good question, I've just asked a similar one don't you think it would be a lot more fun to watch?
2006-07-22 21:31:08 · answer #8 · answered by witty5 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As far as I know, it's not illegal it's just impossible
2006-07-21 03:21:41 · answer #9 · answered by Squirrel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stick petrol-soaked feathers up their bottom and then set light to them. They should easily manage it.
2006-07-21 03:37:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋