This is mainly for the people in the UK :
(situation a)
I let my dog out of my house and it runs to the end of my garden and attacks a young man ripping his face to pieces... The man is in agony and scarred for the rest of his life... The dog is caught and destroyed by ther authorities because it is dangerous.
(situation b)
A man walks out of a pub and attacks another man beating him to the ground and then kicking him in the head so many times that the man is left with brain damage for the rest of his life... The man is caught and pleads guilty resulting in a reduced sentance and with the possability of parole he may be released after a few years.
Why is it OK to kill a dog for being violent and leaving someone physically scarred but not OK to kill a human who leaves someone incapable of leading a normal life..?
I personally think that if a human is deemed to be "Feral" by nature, that they should be destroyed...
What do you think..?
2006-07-21 01:32:41 · 4 answers · asked by just_another_user 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
You can extend your thoughts into daily politics. We live in a wild kingdom : http://www.payvand.com/news/06/jul/1157.html
2006-07-21 01:42:59 · answer #1 · answered by Pishisauraus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great point! They should just pawcuff the dog and make him do community service!
Haha, how wild would it be if you were driving down the road and saw a dog chain gang doing work on the side of the road
2006-07-21 08:38:53 · answer #2 · answered by A.Marie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
world has gone to the dogs,all i can say
just like how can two different people commit the same crime and both have clean records one may get a slap on the hand while the other will get the max. penalty
2006-07-21 08:39:59 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that both of them can be violent and can be also peaceful.
2006-07-21 08:39:04 · answer #4 · answered by doly 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋