2006-07-20 23:40:35 · 9 answers · asked by Chapparo 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
If there are uncomparable, then morality is relative.
2006-07-20 23:45:27 · update #1
Neither is moral, unfortunately.
2006-07-20 23:43:54 · answer #1 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Abortion is immorality because it is a killing of a fetus.
Iraq is more or less immoral because there is a presumption that the Americans are doing it right. No nation is condemning it through the United Nations. Morality is relative considering that it depends upon the person who percieves what is good and what is right. Rule - do what many think what is good.
2006-07-21 06:46:07 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is less moral cos abortion is a personal issue but in Iraq hundreds are injured I mean the harm is much more
2006-07-21 06:45:10 · answer #3 · answered by pinkturtlebursa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Morality is relative. I know this because I've got an uncle Morality and an aunty Moral as well as a cousin Ehtics.
2006-07-21 06:46:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're comparing apples to ducks. So I guess it's relative. I'm pro-choice, but against Iraq. Particularly since the people of Iraq don't get a choice: they're being harrassed and bombed on a daily basis.
2006-07-21 06:46:17 · answer #5 · answered by pete_can_do 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see any moral problem with abortions.
The war in Iraq, on the other hand, was totally immoral.
2006-07-21 06:49:49 · answer #6 · answered by yotg 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They both deny respect of human life. And they are both based on FINANCIAL objectives.
2006-07-21 06:43:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You've already answered your own question!Read the last part!
2006-07-21 06:50:54 · answer #8 · answered by cellm8te 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
apples and oranges are incomparable...it's like when somebody like u ask "who is more intelligent eistein or me?"
2006-07-21 06:44:07 · answer #9 · answered by saurabh k 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋