I need sensible answers please.
2006-07-20 22:07:04 · 4 answers · asked by curious 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities
they re so different.
Science may bring evident advantages,when discoveries are appplied to improve things..yet this is not the point.
You can also see science as the quest for solutions or better knowledge,from this point of view science is the attempt of getting a wider independence from beliefs or old out-of-date 'settings' . (trusting science and progress is for someone a sort of religion.almost).
Art is more individual,at its birth. yet it is the first and ultimate form of communication, the most efficient when you want to share a vision or a feeling. The real cross-borders activity.
2006-07-21 01:55:28 · answer #1 · answered by yukasdog 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creativity is the crux behind these two, and it's what separates us significantly from the rest of God's creation.
To exercise these abilities, some would say, enhances and achieves the highest levels of "humanness".
2006-07-21 05:10:09 · answer #2 · answered by MK6 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Balance of nature: art was created as release for man's emotions, and science as release for his intelligence.
2006-07-21 09:53:51 · answer #3 · answered by Charlotte 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They provide us with an identity, choice and explanations of the unknown
2006-07-21 05:10:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋