Some countries/states allow gun possession by ordinary citizens, while some don't.
2006-07-20 22:00:09 · 8 answers · asked by woonie 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Using both hands.
Seriously though, a government that limits gun ownership treats it's citizens as subjects.
2006-07-21 19:09:28 · answer #1 · answered by .45 Peacemaker 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
gun control is all about control, not guns. It was clearly the intent of the framers of the constitution to keep the citizens armed. This practice has already saved America from three invadsions, those being the revolutionary war, war of 1812, and WWII. The Japanese wanted to invade after pearl harbor, but it was decided against when they realized that there would be a gun "behind every blade of grass."
Also history has consistently shown that governments that are concerned primarily with disarming citizens, also attempt to control it's citizens.
2006-07-26 02:20:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that guns should be controlled like cars, you have to take a safety course before you get a license to purchase them. There would be special tabs for rifles, shotguns, handguns, and for concealed carry. But if you show yourself to be sane and responsible then get what you want.
2006-07-21 08:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by mcguiver 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As far as I know it's my constitutional right, but i read my state penal code the other day and then it gets complicated.
2006-07-21 01:50:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The more rules and regulations you apply the more people are going to offend and rebel.
2006-07-20 22:03:44 · answer #5 · answered by Sharm 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't stand in front of the business end of the barrel.
2006-07-20 22:11:33 · answer #6 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
actually mcguiver you do not need a license to purchase a car, you need one to drive on public roads.
2006-07-24 05:10:01 · answer #7 · answered by benminer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
really?
2006-07-20 22:05:30 · answer #8 · answered by sia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋