I have no answer to your question. But I agree with your views. No one should have nukes, in my opinion
2006-07-20 20:46:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
There are two different kinds of Nuclear reactors. One makes atomic bombs possible, the other uses the spent fuel to make electric power. The one that uses spent fuel is less costly to build. Iran is building the kind that makes atomic bombs possible.
They must want atomic bombs, or they would build the less expensive Nuclear reactors.
We have made atomic weapons antiques, we have MOABs!
M.....Mother
O.....of
A.....all
B.....Bombs
Nuke blast power and no radiation! We have Tomahawks that carry fuel-air explosives war heads. They can carry 10 war heads and burn entire cities.
First the MOAB followed 10 seconds later by a Tomahawk, and everything is flattened then burned with a fire hotter than hell! The oxygen is completely burned off and there's no way to survive! Every city in a country can be targeted and locked into firing solution. Then at 3am any morning the order is given every city can be blown clean away and burned to a cinder all at the same time. Any nation that's not a big land can be a giant smoking hole, one big BOOM and a blinding light followed with a fire that is hotter than hell, and no one survives. Nukes only use now is to poison the air, water, and land. We didn't back India we raised hell, they did it anyway! Blame the Fn Russians, they sold the tech, not us!
We have no way to tell who is a terrorist and who isn't. We therefore must limit who comes into our country and who doesn't. Arab nations let in only those they wish too, why should we not have that right?
As to free trade, there is no such thing! No one gives away their goods! They sell them so it's not free!
2006-07-21 02:04:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Decent and civilized people are equal. We have no objection or fear of England or France or Israel, etc. having nuclear weapons. However, just like one would not give guns to murderers in prison we cannot allow nations with murderous, criminal behavior and intent to have nuclear weapons. So Iran is not equal to civilized nations because they have emphatically stated there intent is to wipe out Israel and nuke various cities in Europe and America. To suggest Iran or N. Korea can be trusted to be responsible with nukes is ludicrous.
Being an American I see people of every ethnic origin (meaning every nation on earth) here in the USA everyday of my life. So how can you say we block people from coming here. You are totally ignorant of our population demographics. To suggest we discriminate against Latinos because of our illegal immigration problem is just plain dishonest. What country can survive if it has no control of its own borders. Look at Cyprus right now with all the refugees from Lebanon. They can take no more because there resources are at the breaking point. You cant have an uncontrolled flood of people into any region without suffering adverse effects. Water is good. It is necessary for life. But a flood of water kills! So stop criticizing or take them into your own home at the expense of your own family. Plus know that six Hezbolah terrorists were caught sneaking illegally accross our border with Mexico. We had better control our borders or surrender the lives of millions of our citizens when terrorists blow up some of our cities. To ignore this problem is suicide!
2006-07-21 23:44:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Matthew O 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nuclear weapons are to destructive.. we are trying to eliminate the ones we have along with the rest of the world.. it does no good to make any more.. and the thought of an unstable 3rd world nation that has a history of attacking others with out reason is just insane..
2006-07-20 20:48:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by LokoLobo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reported
2006-07-20 20:46:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jolly1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Specifically in Iraq, every explaination of "we're looking for energy", is laced with talk about "Isreal needs to be destroyed". When the 2 ideas are constantly put together, and add that Iran is backing al Queda, it's hard to believe that Iran is looking for energy.
2006-07-20 20:52:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by nursesr4evr 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think that there is just one reason for this. The government has been trying to be the "police" of the world for a while now. Our current government (I don't think) does not have very much support from the people of the country.
2006-07-20 20:51:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by singitoutloudandclear 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
because there are treaties between the countries of the world limiting nuclear weapons to the countries that already had them.
That is why. India already had them at the time of the treaty.
2006-07-20 21:04:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by MP US Army 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
because the Hitler of Iran wants to kill us and so does his friends that like to come here and set up sleeper cells. We keep the nukes laying around in case the Hitler in the desert gets antz.
2006-07-20 21:12:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Craig 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well to answer your first question..gee I think their current leader has said that he wants to destroy all Jews and Americans. So we let him go ahead and build weapons to do that? Me thinks not. America is a land built by immigrants. But they were and are legal. We let all those in who are law abiding and want to better themselves and help America prosper. That way it's a win win situation. All we want is peace but we will fight and win against those who would harm us first. If they be good we be good. lol
2006-07-20 20:55:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
youre kidding right?
because Iran WILL give those weapons to terrorists and Iran WILL NOT hesitate to use them.
2006-07-20 20:58:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by rsist34 5
·
0⤊
0⤋