What policy will he introduce, how would he or she manage the country, will the relation between US and muslim country be better, etc .
2006-07-20 18:08:42 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Anything can be possible. We might have a woman winning elections soon...so everyone can become a President though Im sure it will be a struggle and very hard for a Black American to win an election due to all this racism and stuff.
But I hope someday another race of people govern the US then we will be able to compare our experiences and maybe also a Muslim, why not? There is nothing wrong about a Muslim being a President of the US.
2006-07-20 18:12:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The best elected official is one who will govern based on logic and objectivity. Therefore, he should not be religious. Therefore, I hope that no Muslim, Jew, no other Born Again Christian, or any other religious wacko becomes President.
"""""Never, because the USA divides church from state and you cant run an modern economy based on a religion. the evidence of this is how backward technologically and culturally 99.99% of islamic infrastuctures and societies are. The advanced races realise this."""""
I absolutely agree with your first sentence. The backwardness in your second sentence is preposterous. Quite a few nations in the Middle East and Turkey are quite advanced at the time being. What advanced races are you referring to in your last sentence??? Because Islam is a religion, not a race. And Muslims have many different races: Arab, Persian (indo-european), Turk, Indonesian-Philippino (eastern asia), African (senegal for example), European (Albanians, Bosnians...)... Seems as though you know little to nothing in regards to the content of your response.
2006-07-20 19:09:25 · answer #2 · answered by Shivers 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if the country LASTS long enough, it's certainly possible. But a lot could happen in that time. Maybe the Muslim community at large will figure out how to separate itself from the extremists that make the rest look bad. Maybe the Baha'i will become the equivalent of Christians in the Roman era, and we'll all get a lot more peaceful and wise. Who knows ?
2006-07-20 18:16:13 · answer #3 · answered by Raffy_AdAstra 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
By law, yes ... it is commonly referred to as Freedom of Religion.
Section One of Article II of the U.S. Constitution establishes the requirements one must meet in order to become President. The president must be a natural-born citizen of the United States (or a citizen of the United States at the time the U.S. Constitution was adopted), be at least 35 years old, and have been a resident of the United States for 14 years.
The only time recently that the natural-born citizenship requirement has been implicated in regard to a presidential candidate was in 1968. That year, Michigan Gov. George W. Romney was a candidate for the Republican nomination for President. Romney had been born in Chihuahua, Mexico to American parents.
2006-07-20 18:16:35 · answer #4 · answered by TEK 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not! No Muslim will ever be President of our country. The American voter may be stupid (remember, about half voted for Kerry-Edwards), but he's hardly such a moron as to vote for a Muslim. Muslims have been given a bad name by those few insane dupes who bomb buses and pizza parlors, killing innocent people in an effort to effect political change. I have news for you: Such tactics will never work because they enrage the victims; they do not cause him to adhere to your way of thinking. And here's a second news flash: There are NO virgins waiting for you in Hell.
2006-07-20 18:19:55 · answer #5 · answered by christopher s 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The next? Not a chance, A Muslim would have to be in the spot light already looking for the job. and so far none have put themselfs out there.
2006-07-20 18:14:57 · answer #6 · answered by DaFinger 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
greater effective than probable, i'm no longer able to think of of a Republican i could help. i'm somewhat turning out to be bored with getting to vote for the lesser of two evils. BTW i like your call and Icon, too undesirable the maximum modern action picture sucked so tricky! It replaced into an affront to each HP fan.
2016-12-10 11:27:03 · answer #7 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never, because the USA divides church from state and you cant run an modern economy based on a religion. the evidence of this is how backward technologically and culturally 99.99% of islamic infrastuctures and societies are. The advanced races realise this.
2006-07-20 18:13:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and I'm going to head up the NAACP.
2006-07-20 18:16:18 · answer #9 · answered by jengirl9 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Way!! How about Jewish, Buddhist Etc. No Way in Hell!!
2006-07-20 18:14:02 · answer #10 · answered by timinator 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋