Are we different than the animals?

Question

Not if you look at DNA. Humans and Chimps have a 98% DNA match.
This doesnt make sence to me at all!
Am i not like my brother 98%
then how am i like a chimp 98%
Thats evolutional b.s if is it not i dont get it!
Maybe dna is in your blood, what does blood have to do with skin!
Blood is blood, skin is body?
Any one that knows how i am thinking wrong let me know..with an answer?

Answer 1

There are many similarities between humans and apes. Most of the chromosomes are the same, as well as the ABO blood type. ABO blood type is a system of classification. For a while we have known that the DNA code of humans and chimpanzees are very similar too.


The university of California states that differences between humans and apes are physical and functional. We, humans, look different than apes, and we can talk and they can't. Also, the brain sizes are different. These are some of the physical differences. The reasons we are different physically and functionally can be explained by a very small difference in the genetic code. The genetic code defines the features of a living organism.

http://www.franklinlakes.k12.nj.us/famsweb/curriculum/science/hpowers/PowersResearch/Research6/BrittanyBsci/simanddif.html

Answer 2

we're 98% like chimps in the sense of our bodies are 98% like chimps not that we're related by blood. You and your brother share DNA similarities because you come from the same parents and have similar blood and DNA

Answer 3

DNA is in every cell of your body, Unless foreign organism or symbiote.

the difference between 99% and 100% are millions of coded sequences because the genome is so big. That's why a banana is 70% the same DNA. People also mistake evolution for everday phenomenon. It takes millions and millions of years to get from common ancestors of the banana tree to homo sapiens.

We have a language, animals have sign-systems-- but no grammar. They can use one-word sentences to alert, cry, express anger, demand, etc. But they can't string them together. Our world is very symbolic-- but animals do not lack reason. They are not robots, they care about themselves and their environment clearly. And are quite social in the same respects that we are. To think our great intellects confer mastery over them is an abuse of power, just like any other justification of oppression, slavery, and murder. Truly, if it is just intelligence that separates us, then why not eat the retarded, the newborns, the deaf-mute, the comatose, the geriatric? because we have clouded our perception of what counts as being alive, and what to respect.

Answer 4

who said you were like a chimp? If you were from a chimp, than why do we still have chimps? ASK that question who explains evolution. The only thing that is the same from an animal is the "animal instinct" we still have alot of them around. Yet animals have better natural instinct, than alot of people.

Answer 5

Do animals read? Can they speak in sentences?

Do they know they are mortal? Can they build complex machines? Can they perform mathematical exercises? Can they change their environment? Can they grasp simple morality?

The simple answer to your question is that we are different because of our social and intellectual development.

Physically the differences between humans and animals are essentially superficial, however when you look beyond those differences to the things that truly make us different humans are a quantum leap beyond their animal friends.

If you accept any part of the creation story as it appears in Genesis you should accept the part where it says man will be dominant over animals, and by implication will be responsible for their well-being.

Answer 6

First of all, I must state that some animals and particularly mammals stand out amongst the rest in the animal kingdom.

As to your question, yes. We reason and think to a level that the animal kingdom can not.
Look at what we are capable of learning and creating. Any animal/mammal our equals in this regard? No. Hence, a huge difference.

Answer 7

Yes, albeit humans are animals there are many various differences associated with intelligence, reasoning, and will, of which most animals do not posses, but your question is most arguable pertaining to the DNA structure.

Answer 8

How can all of us quite believe Noah ought to probably deliver mutually 2 of each specie to placed on the ark?!? imagine of the time that could be required to stroll the completed earth and to sail the amazing oceans to deliver mutually 2 of each specie. with the exception of, he may then favor to get them to maintain on with him. He may might want to feed them. lots of the species may die before they ever attain the ark. The planet isn't a very hospitable position to many species once they're faraway from their organic habitat. in accordance to the UN Biodiversity programme†: "subsequently far, round a million.7 million species were got here across and defined. This roster of time-honored species is convinced to be only a fragment of the completed variety. ... in truth, there are probably 15 to 20 unnamed tropical species for each named one." subsequently, besides the actuality that if we settle for the decrease reduce of time-honored species, Noah may have had to deliver mutually all of them. it is not some thing plausible actual do in a existence time, a lot less one hundred lifetimes. Ah, perchance he had Santa Claus-like powers and changed into able to droop time. As for the great-continent argument, Pangaea‡ (call of the great-continent) existed 250 million years in the past, no longer fewer than 6000 years in the past. a lot for the argument that Noah may have walked each of the earth to deliver mutually the species. Noah may have in a roundabout way have had to achieve Australia, New Zealand, Galapagos, between a myriad of alternative islands to deliver mutually those species, too. (Does that recommend Noah changed into the first to circumnavigate the globe?!?) How precisely does one clarify this? I consider the questioner, that you'll be able to believe interior the Christian God (which i do no longer) even as nonetheless accepting the concepts in the back of evolution. both favor no longer be incompatible.

Answer 9

We are animals plain and simple. It is only our stupendously sized vanity that makes us believe otherwise. We have made religions and invented a God that has put the stamp of credibility on our stupid self importance. We are pitiful animals. And we would be incredibly funny if we were not so dangerous to ourselfs and every other animal.

Answer 10

Our genetic makeup is very similar. However, the human has much more differences in regulating genes (how and how much genes are expressed in mRNA). This turns out to be very important. The sequencing DNA turns out to be less important than mRNA expression.