If a symmetrical particle did expand into our universe, is it then possible to have a universe of symmetry?
2006-07-20 14:22:22 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
without the science of teh symetrical particle, the hindu believe that for every action, there must be an opposite, yet equal reaction.
that is the foundation for the "yin/yang" and the spirit in eternal turmoil.
-eagle
2006-07-20 14:29:43 · answer #1 · answered by eaglemyrick 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What it means to cause everything is curious. A virus is said to cause AIDS. The virus is present up to ten years prior to onset of symptoms.
Could the big bang have been similar in it's origin? Could the cause have been there up to a certain period of time prior to the onset of the event itself? Could time have been there in steady state, and always has been, and yet, seeded itself in the event of creation that takes all that ever could be and makes it so small as to be able to be transported to an orbital as small as the first sp and expand it out to as big as the big bang has become, and symmetry be maintained. The symmetrical particle that did expand into your universe was special indeed, wasn't it. Trouble is noone cares about it. They care about the credit for the theories that get the acceptance. The actual particle that did the universe, gets nothing for all it's sacrifice and hard work and sheer balls at trying such a stunt. And it was a stunt. There was no reason to expect that it would work, was there? Was there any evidence that it would work and come out well?
2006-07-20 18:26:06 · answer #2 · answered by little kiss from the sun 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the most popular belief by scientists today on the occurence of the bing bang is called "vacuum genesis" .
according the quantum theory, there must be small fluctuations of energy even in a complete vacuum. this is a well established fact.
it is thought that these tiny fluctuations are the source of the big bang to begin with.
as hard as it sounds to believe, the universe came from nothing !
although not testable by any current technology, this theory offers a reasonable method of creation without involving a third party ( which itself has to be explained ) . it puts an end to the problem of infinite regression ( which plagues any theory involving a creator ( which must also must have a explainable origin ).
2006-07-20 17:51:11 · answer #3 · answered by fullbony 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Two of the more interesting and plausible theories --
(1) The creation of our universe is related to the physics of Heisenberg's probability equations. Within that field of physics arises the mathematical statement that all things are possible, even the creation of a universe out of nothing.
(2) Our universe resulted from a quantum fluctuation in some other larger or infinite medium.
2006-07-20 14:57:38 · answer #4 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go with the first answer (M theory) - also you can check out "The Elegant Universe" and "The Fabric of the Cosmos" by Brian Greene for more info.
2006-07-20 14:35:52 · answer #5 · answered by JBarleycorn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-07-20 14:59:19 · answer #6 · answered by DW 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
most people dont realize that just before the big bang... there was the big shut up you mouth.
it was real quiet for a long time
then and only then after that....
then came the big bang!!!
the big bang... lol ...really who believes in that in the new
millenium?
2006-07-20 14:38:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure... type in M Theory into your search box.
2006-07-20 14:25:20 · answer #8 · answered by hyperhealer3 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋