Given that she had affairs with nine other men during her marriage.
2006-07-20 13:49:56 · 19 answers · asked by rp804110 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Ofcourse she was!! Charles is no saint either........to be fair, they should not have married, had nothing in common.
This dear friends is still no excuse for having extra marital affairs! Esp as they are/were high profile respected figures....these folk should be setting a good example to their kindom....instead they show us that they have loose morals, nice !
2006-07-21 06:35:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Nope cause Prince Charles was Cheating on Her even durning the Engagement & Durning the Marriage ..So I feel she had a right to do what ever her little heart desired she deserved to do as she wanted why is it Men think they can Cheat but it's Wrong for a Women.Prince Charles was with his new wife durning his whole courtship with Diana & that wasn't right at all he should of never married her if he was in Love with someone else...
2006-07-20 13:58:57 · answer #2 · answered by sugarbdp1 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
what is a slapper?
9 affairs? you know more than the rest of the world... but it is ok for the prince to cheat?
2006-07-20 13:54:04 · answer #3 · answered by irl_merrick 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
that poor girl was only 19 when she married that user!! she thought he really loved her BUT she was USED as a brood mare!!!! and then discarded After the way she was treated no wonder she tried to turn to someone else!! in the end she didn't have anyone worth trusting to turn to!! prince charles wasn't fit to lick her boots never mind fit to become a king!!!!!! all she wanted was to be consoled,and to feel loved, god rest her ,she was the loneliest person in the world, and if he had not married her under false pretences and had honestly loved her she would still be alive today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-07-20 14:38:27 · answer #4 · answered by Catherine R 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes and what bugs me is the way she carried on about Charles havbing an affair with Camilla, playing the victim, most annoying.
2006-07-20 20:46:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I don't think that at all! she was in an empty shell marriage and the only reason theres any light on her personal life is because she was part of the royal family, if she were someone else no one else would have thought that
2006-07-20 13:56:39 · answer #6 · answered by freedom_of_speech 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I suppose Prince Charles' ongoing affair with Camilla Parker Bowles (now his second wife) makes him a champ? Oh, that's right ... it's OK for men to cheat. That makes him a stud. And honestly, don't you have anything better to do than count the (alleged) number of men she slept with?
2006-07-20 14:35:39 · answer #7 · answered by celticwoman777 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think that she used poor judgment in some ways, considering that she had children who looked up to her. Still, in most ways I believe that she tried to be a good mother and leader who spent much of her time doing good for others.
2006-07-20 13:58:49 · answer #8 · answered by Sunshine 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. But she also had one hell of a wedding dress. Too bad the best thing about that marriage was the wedding.
2006-07-20 13:54:44 · answer #9 · answered by Katrine 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree. Bad ramifications if her last affair went the distance???>
2006-07-20 22:05:48 · answer #10 · answered by vasag2003 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋