IF U haven't go see it.......sick a.s.s. movie....
2006-07-20 13:10:07 · 22 answers · asked by bugojanka69 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I saw it and really liked it. It was gross but there were some nice boobies in there.
2006-07-20 13:13:22 · answer #1 · answered by Good Gushy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I didn't think Hostel was that great only because they cut on the gore. I don't like when they begin to show you something gruesome and they cut on it. Why must we be left thinking that something gruesome happened when we could just be left with seeing the whole gruesome situation being taken place. Another reason why I thought Hostel wasn't a great movie should not come to a huge surprise but the beginning of the movie was all about sexual inuendos and sexual content. Everytime we watch a horror movie sex always has to be a main guide into getting killed. Why must horror movies be led to that as the only resort? Couldn't the writers find something more original than that. I sat through the whole hour and a half of the movie and watched sex, sex, sex, sex, and sex. I was totally disgusted with the whole concept of the movie. I think they could've came up with something more brilliant and original.
2006-07-20 15:23:45 · answer #2 · answered by musicgrlluvher 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure what I was expecting but it definitely was not THAT. I swear for the first 45 minutes nothing happened except people got naked, high/drunk, or had sex. If you're into that kind of thing then whatever. It just moved really slowly during the beginning. then BAM! Some very gross things. I guess that was the point though since it did do a very good job of making me cringe.
Overall, not a great movie. Unless you're into that stuff. And I'm in no rush to backpack through eastern europe now.
2006-07-20 13:17:37 · answer #3 · answered by poprocks24 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that the thought of that being a possible true just fricken disgusts me. Fact is people with money have too much damn power because they can afford to do what they want. I thought that melting the ladies face was disgusting esspecially after the eye was ripped out
2006-07-20 15:52:31 · answer #4 · answered by Cheryl 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I admit, I went to see it because Tarrantino was involved. Now, I figure someone just paid him some moolah to present the film. I personally like the storyline, loathe the gore. I had to fast-forward through all gross parts and I still saw way too much. I have one thing to say...Achilles tendon.
It will definately make you think twice before backpacking in Europe.
2006-07-20 13:23:11 · answer #5 · answered by geniusH 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I think that it was the most overhyped movie of the year. Don't give me porn when I am expecting horror. And I don't consider what was presented in that movie to be "horror."
Horrific? Yes.
Inhumane? Yes.
Barbaric? Yes.
Entertaining? No.
2006-07-20 13:14:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i didn't like it. While the story was somewhat... strange, the whole movie was pointless. They made it out to be so gruesome and disgusting, and I (who cringe at even just a cut) could sit through the whole thing.
2006-07-20 13:33:22 · answer #7 · answered by Katie Victoria 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i could have done without the t & a. the story wasnt great, either, but ive seen worse (Cabin Fever, anyone?). what the hell was with those psychotic orphans?? i cant stand Eli Roth's movies.
2006-07-20 13:21:47 · answer #8 · answered by cheekeeteeta 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i thought it was a porno at first lol the effects were ok, the storyline dragged on a bit, was not that sick, it was worth seeing the once, not something i would watch again and again
2006-07-20 13:16:45 · answer #9 · answered by Mandy J 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I enjoyed the gore, but the story line kinda sucked.
2006-07-20 13:13:04 · answer #10 · answered by Cherry Red 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it was way too gorey and pretty much pointless with kind of a "blah" ending...id perfer not to watch it again =(
2006-07-20 13:14:15 · answer #11 · answered by JA+JH 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋