Every time I have expressed my Pro-live views the Pro-Choice women start foaming at the mouth and screaming "WHY DO YOU WANT CONTROL OF MY BODY!?!?!?? Well the truth (a novel concept for some) that I don't care one bit if you destroy your own body, you are an adult and able to make your own decisions. What I am trying to protect is the body of the baby that you want to kill.
Okay there I said it let the hate begin. I'm sure this one will bring on some real nice ones.
2006-07-20 12:59:00 · 17 answers · asked by Ethan M 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think you are right, women should be forced to have babies, that baby hasn't raped any one yet so there is still a chance it won't end up like it's father. And child birth can't be that difficult, I mean some of these women scream on and on and on, I mean come on, it can't be that painful, sheesh.
Maybe you should try an experiment and let me know how it goes, take a small water mellon and stick it wear the sun don't shine. Let me know how this doesn't effect your body!
2006-07-20 13:06:34 · answer #1 · answered by humean9 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
How many males in the past avoided the issue of an unplanned pregnancy by saying"she slept around with at least the football team. How do I know it's mine " They didn't step up to the plate then and it is seldom any different now. However with DNA testing it is easier to to prove paternity. Today the"man" still has a responsibility in prevention but he doesn't want to spoil the mood.If he doesn't do his part before the act of intimacy don't suddenly get on his moral high horse and suddenly get a conscience. It takes 2 to tango but usually only 1 gets to complete the dance.The time to be concerned about unplanned prenancy is before coception.Be sure you BOTH use birth control (and maybe self control too).
2006-07-20 22:16:22 · answer #2 · answered by gussie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think your point is valid- for you this is not about controlling women's bodies. You want to prevent people from destroying life, so you have to control a woman's body to do that- but for you that is incidental.
I also think that the pro-choice argument, that for them it is about choice, is also valid. Different aspects of the same activity are important to different people for different reasons, and they emphasize the relevance of one aspect over the other based on the principle that supports their argument.
I am a pro-choice man. If I get a woman pregnant, I want the option to abort the pregnancy. I also want mothers who consider themselves unfit or unable to raise kids to be able to abort the pregnancy. I have no problem with using abortion as emergency birth control because I don't think that life is worth saving. There's nothing immoral for me to end a life that is unaware that it has life and no one else is attached to it that isn't making the decision. In fact, I think it is immoral to force unwanted children to be born if their parents are willing to abort them.
People have different moral codes. Sometimes they conflict. It's pretty much a war, not that I have to tell you. And honestly, I think it is a wedge issue, a distraction used by politicians to divert our focus on the fact that they have the real power, and the real choice.
So issues like abortion keep us fighting against each other instead of looking at why we only have 2 parties to realistically choose from, and the candidates from either party only come from the top 1%, and that they depend on the top 1% (giant corporations, especially the 8 who own 90% of the media in the US) for campaign contributions, lobby money, and air time, and that all the laws they pass tend to benefit the top 1% at the expense of the rest of us- who have spent the last 30 years fighting each other on wedge issues, while wages have gone down and people have to work longer hours competing for jobs becuase...
Oh wait, I started on my liberal rant and I already answered your question.
2006-07-20 20:54:32 · answer #3 · answered by Aaron 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
After you masturbated today and flushed the toilet how many babies did you kill? Yeah, yeah, yeah I know you need the egg to start the process but without the two parts you don't have the baby. So why is your ejaculation not murder in your small little mind? I'm also a male so don't yell at the women because of my comment. How many of you pro-lifers are out adopting all these babies that you are so concerned about? Teach teens about sex and how to use condoms and having responsibility. Nobody wants to have an abortion but there are circumstances which happen in your life and we all make choices everyday. We all make mistakes its a fact of life. Standing up and preaching doesn't make you holier then thou. I guess if a baby that you saved starved to death because the parents counldn't feed it is fine in your little world.
2006-07-20 20:26:47 · answer #4 · answered by Thomas S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Here is a novel question for you:" At what point do you consider a fetus to be a human being??" By definition, a fetus is human once it has reached maturity. Therefore an abortion, by definition, cannot be qualified as killing a human being. You might say it qualifies as killing a future human being. But then here is the catch: When young teens have wet dreams or masturbate, the loss of sperm can also be considered "future" babies that we are killing. Simply put, abortion is not technically the killing of a human being...
2006-07-20 20:11:27 · answer #5 · answered by Shivers 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's really about the American military/ This country needs a continuing supply of young disenfranchised people to grow up and have little alternatives other than joining the Military.
The sanctity of unborn life must be protected and the Military will have enough troops.
Nothing personal, just business.
2006-07-20 20:08:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ethan M ..if you could have a baby I am sure you would but as you have no real stake in this beyond the endless lip service you provide on the subject I would say "but out" ?
2006-07-20 20:08:42 · answer #7 · answered by hardartsystems 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are young and don't understand Heaven on Earth, maybe some day you'll See Christ in your heart and Know the truth, be aware god knows the hate inisde your own heart, Silly.
2006-07-20 20:07:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they want to get rid of the parasite living in their body, who are you to tell them not to. Since it is not something that can live on its own, it really is just a parasite, not a human being.
2006-07-20 20:35:09 · answer #9 · answered by beren 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The abortion issue affects ALL women and their unborn babies, potentially, when it comes to the question of legislation.
2006-07-20 20:03:37 · answer #10 · answered by surlygurl 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋