If you look at vouchers as a way to promote competition (translation: capitalism) then you should answer yes.
The public school system in most states is pathetic. It is a behemoth that does not change because there are no forces capable of making the system change. The system is well aware that most parents cannot afford to send their children to private school, and each public school gets paid a certain amount per day the child attends (note I did not say that the school gets paid a certain amount per day that the child LEARNS SOMETHING).
Teachers are horribly underpaid to begin their career, and by the time they are making anywhere near decent money, they are typically too old to care about teaching, and tenured so that they cannot be fired even if they are brain dead. Yet, the public school system makes a ton of money...so where is it going? Try looking in senior administrators/union officials/slush funds bank accounts (my opinion).
If we used vouchers as a way to improve the public schools, the public schools would be forced to shape up or ship out. As long as all of the kids are getting a better education (and competition tends to make that happen), why not?
2006-07-20 13:35:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Law Professor 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think private schools should get vouchers at all from the government, religious or not. They are PRIVATE. They're BUSINESSES. They are responsible for their own wellbeing. The government should not have to rescue them.
Our public school system sucks, we need to give the public schools money.
2006-07-20 12:54:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by suliman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Considering how undesirable our government has made public education. Considering the failure ratio in the public schools. I would most definitely say YES! The government pays thousands of dollars for our children to attend broken down buildings being taught by under paid and disgruntled teachers. With the violence in the school systems now I think that Americans should have the freedom to decide on their children's educational experiences. Religious schools or not if they have a higher achievement ratio and a cleaner, safer environment, and you want your child to attend it then why should the government pay thousands of dollars to anywhere accept where you decide?
2006-07-20 13:01:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by angelsforanimals 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Nobody is forcing anyone to go to a private school. Secondly, religion and government do not mix and shouldn't. The solution isn't to give people vouchers to send kids to private schools, the solution is to get our public schools up to par. If we can afford vouchers, we can afford to fix up what we have.
2006-07-20 13:02:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by ginabgood1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i imagine that as long as they gov't is unwilling to make any major ameliorations to how the dep.. of Ed is run and the way instructors are experienced, evaluated and retained then vouchers are truly the only thanks to help the children who desire a tremendous coaching get one - and a tremendous coaching advantages all of society. for my section i imagine that vouchers are dumb and the money spent on vouchers might want to bypass to fixing public faculties. Ever see the West Wing? "Public faculties must be cathedrals to attending to understand." easily. yet till the gov't and the instructors unions and faculty directors are prepared to take a seat and comply with quite recommendations vouchers are the only component that ought to help the children who're in college now. notwithstanding, i do not imagine it is going to probably be an open door component - scholars might want to prepare and earn spots at deepest faculties. Why waste severe priced education and constrained seats on youthful ones who don't love it or received't artwork for it? yet - i imagine that the vouchers ought to receive without strings, like a education waiver. the authorities should not be allowed any say over how those faculties are run - they screwed up public faculties rather nicely and could no longer be allowed the threat to do a corresponding to faculties that artwork.
2016-10-15 00:46:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by garion 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO!! Private schools are not bound by the same state standards that the public schools are. If they do not have to follow the state standards they should not receive state funding.
2006-07-20 13:03:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by physandchemteach 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes it is your money, you pay taxes for the local schools, if you don't like them, you still have to pay or if you don't have children you still pay. So why not use YOUR money to pay for a better school? They are your children...
Think about it...
2006-07-20 12:56:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-07-20 12:55:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by shellmybell15 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes they should
2006-07-20 12:54:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by A 6
·
0⤊
0⤋