English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-20 12:29:53 · 8 answers · asked by Silver Bells 1 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

8 answers

function y is not monotonic in x, so its inverse is not defined.

For each value of y in y=[-2,0] there are 3 values of x in the range [-1,1].

2006-07-20 14:19:46 · answer #1 · answered by none2perdy 4 · 0 0

Actually, this is just a basic cubic function, so it will pass the vertical line test.

First make it so all the x's are on one side: y+1 = 4x^3-3x

Then you get: y+1 = x(4x^2-3)

To get the inverse just switch X and Y : X+1 = y(4y^2-3)

Now solve for y.

2006-07-20 12:46:34 · answer #2 · answered by ymingy@sbcglobal.net 4 · 0 0

There is no inverse for this function because it fails the horizontal line test. It has a double root at x = -1/2. It is a function and passes the vertical line test. You would have to bound the domain in order to talk about an inverse like the trig graphs.

2006-07-20 15:24:51 · answer #3 · answered by msmath 1 · 0 0

the 1st step is interchange y and x ensuing in this equation; x = {(3y + a million)/4}^a million/2; Then clean up for y in terms of x sq. the two facets of the equation, x^2 = (3y + a million)/4 Multiply the whole equation via 4 4x^2 = 3y + a million Transposing a million and dividing the equation via 3 will provide us inverse of the equation y = (4x^2 - a million)/3

2016-12-10 11:18:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This function will not pass the vertical line test, and as such it is not well defined for an inverse function.

You can't do it.

-Math Teacher

2006-07-20 12:38:14 · answer #5 · answered by lovingdaddyof2 4 · 0 0

yeah no inverse

2006-07-28 10:48:39 · answer #6 · answered by spido_razor 3 · 0 0

just switch x and y around and solve for y

2006-07-20 16:27:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

?1-x3-3x4=y

2006-07-20 12:33:23 · answer #8 · answered by D J 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers