function y is not monotonic in x, so its inverse is not defined.
For each value of y in y=[-2,0] there are 3 values of x in the range [-1,1].
2006-07-20 14:19:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by none2perdy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, this is just a basic cubic function, so it will pass the vertical line test.
First make it so all the x's are on one side: y+1 = 4x^3-3x
Then you get: y+1 = x(4x^2-3)
To get the inverse just switch X and Y : X+1 = y(4y^2-3)
Now solve for y.
2006-07-20 12:46:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by ymingy@sbcglobal.net 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no inverse for this function because it fails the horizontal line test. It has a double root at x = -1/2. It is a function and passes the vertical line test. You would have to bound the domain in order to talk about an inverse like the trig graphs.
2006-07-20 15:24:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by msmath 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
the 1st step is interchange y and x ensuing in this equation; x = {(3y + a million)/4}^a million/2; Then clean up for y in terms of x sq. the two facets of the equation, x^2 = (3y + a million)/4 Multiply the whole equation via 4 4x^2 = 3y + a million Transposing a million and dividing the equation via 3 will provide us inverse of the equation y = (4x^2 - a million)/3
2016-12-10 11:18:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This function will not pass the vertical line test, and as such it is not well defined for an inverse function.
You can't do it.
-Math Teacher
2006-07-20 12:38:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by lovingdaddyof2 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah no inverse
2006-07-28 10:48:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by spido_razor 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
just switch x and y around and solve for y
2006-07-20 16:27:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
?1-x3-3x4=y
2006-07-20 12:33:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by D J 2
·
0⤊
0⤋