yess
he's truely the best player ever.
2006-07-20 12:04:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by bz_co0l@rogers.com 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
He may end up as almost a consensus all-time #1 (which I would not mind seeing), but at age 24, and with "only" 8 major titles, I would not put him there yet.
As I've answered elsewhere, I believe that the all-time #1 has to be Rod Laver. The man won the (complete) Grand Slam twice, and 7 years apart at that (1962 and 1969). He, for all intents and purposes, was barred from playing and winning any majors from 1963-68. Assuming, he won 'only' twice per year during those 6 years, he would have won 23 major titles instead of 11. A very dominant player in his era!
I'd probably put Sampras (14 majors) ahead of Federer for now, based on longevity.
But even if I put Federer at around #3 in the modern era (in the last 40-50 years), at age 24, that's not too shabby.
2006-07-21 04:25:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Da Whispering Genius 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO hes not cuz he cant beat nadal on clay so that does not make him the greatest player. the greatest player has to win a few grandslams and nadal is the only obstacle in federers way. therefore no federer isnt that greatest player but hes good but not great. Sampras defines great. :)
2006-07-21 17:51:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by rk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think that Federer is the greatest layer ever! Federe is a good player but not the best.
2006-07-20 19:05:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't agree, have to say Sampras is a greater tennis player.
2006-07-20 22:08:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Movie Buff 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is good but not the greatest. Billie Jean King is the greatest and always will be.
2006-07-22 19:35:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by tensnut90_99 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he has to watch out because he might not even end up being the best player of his era.....that could quite possibly be Nadal
2006-07-21 22:12:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. andre agassi is the greatest tennis player ever
2006-07-21 10:06:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by rizwano 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He seems to be a genuinely nice guy as well as a topnotch player.
2006-07-20 19:12:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Hot Stuff 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, but hes getting boring now - he just wins everything. He should give Roddick a chance!
2006-07-20 19:06:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe so. He has already accomplished enough to put him there so everything else from here on out will be icing on the cake. Can you say 'dynasty"?
2006-07-21 16:17:04
·
answer #11
·
answered by -:¦:-SKY-:¦:- 7
·
0⤊
0⤋