English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is there any where in the universe that would not have any atoms?

Or is that the definition of space...that it has things in it?

2006-07-20 10:57:41 · 13 answers · asked by Crystal Violet 6 in Science & Mathematics Physics

13 answers

There are places in the universe with no atoms. Two such regions are known. One is the interior of a neutron star, where the matter is compressed to such densities that the electrons are squeezed into the neutrons and protons. Under those conditions, no atoms can exist.

The other such place is at the ergosphere of a black hole with less than galactic mass. At that boundary, the tidal forces from gravitation are so intense that even atoms are ripped apart. Smaller black holes can have such intense tidal force that even larger subatomic particles can be destroyed.

In normal space, even the cleanest vacuum in space has a few atoms here and there. There are great voids betwen galaxies, but even these are not perfect vacuums. In space near our Sun, there are between 1 and 3 atoms per cubic centimeter even in the cleanest vacuum.

2006-07-20 12:03:40 · answer #1 · answered by aichip_mark2 3 · 5 0

Universe is a tricky thing.According to scintifics concepts (not getting into religion & other stuff)...

All the universe started at some point in time & space (space as in a co-ordinate) , an called event" Big Bang ".


Now let's consider what happened from there . Let's consider this event happened at time t =0 & x =0 (let's consider a single dimension of space ...since it's symmetric in all the three dimensions )

let's consider the the curretn age of the universe be "t". i.e. the big bang happened t years ago.

According to "laws of relativity" nothing can travel faster than the speed of light . So , this sets up a boundary for the known universe

x= c*t (c i sht espeed of the light & t is the current age )

beyond this x, the space & time co-ordinates are not even defined .
This distace is actually the raduis of a sphere of light diverging from the single point from where big bang began .This may be called a " Whit Space " as light exists there .The region of space where the light has not reaches still may be called " Black space".

(This actually is the undefined portion of the space where for certainity nothing exists ...leave alone atoms ,even the concept of time . With every second as the white space is taking over this black space ..the time 7& space is starting to get " meaning"

So, it's the black space where nothing exists .

Hope this answers your question!



P.S.: There is no way to find actually & precisely what that "t" is ...

2006-07-20 11:00:31 · answer #2 · answered by Nihilist 3 · 0 0

Uhhhhhhhhhhh, emtpy space would have no atoms. That is why it is called empty space. And just to let you know, most of our known universe is empty. Matter (atoms) occupy a VERY small portion of space. In fact, I don't know how much chemistry/physics you know, even IN matter, there is a huge space between molecules and atmos. And then those atmos have more space inside them.

If an atom was blown up to a size of a football field, the nucleus inside would be the size of a pea. And the rest would be empty space and even the electrons, you can just ignore them. They are so small.

2006-07-20 11:12:27 · answer #3 · answered by The Prince 6 · 0 0

No the definition of space is that it DOESN'T have things in it. Even the gaps between the atoms in your body are places that don't have atoms. I think you need to think about what you really mean by a 'place'.

2006-07-20 11:01:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The hypothesis is; without understanding the universe would not exist. For the eternity in the previous one is born there is in basic terms nothingness. Nothingness could be defined as a results of fact the state in the previous beginning and after dying. The window in-between is life, that excellent yet short 2d whilst life is switched on, whilst life and the universe turns into actual. The universe can't incorporate nothingness, the vacuum of area is a sea of digital debris, the vastness previous its observable limits and the time in the previous its beginning is greater effective than nothingness. The eternity and infinities of the greater effective universe can in basic terms exist in that short 2d of understanding, and however the extensive wide awake concepts can't settle for infinities different than a limiteless nothingness. The universe is inner maximum and intimate to the guy. A universe without life is a failed universe, it can't exist as a results of fact there isn't any understanding of it. A universe crammed with life can no longer exist for the unborn or lifeless. The universe is an fairly intimate component, it exists for one living individual and that specific on my own, and all different such all and sundry is area of that specific's universe and no you are able to truly practice in any different case. yet, even in spite of the indisputable fact that this argument can't be disproved, i've got a sneaking suspicion you have self belief the choice, that the universe does have an life self sustaining of understanding. i could desire to admit in spite of the indisputable fact that, for each individual in the previous beginning and after dying, the universe does no longer exist.

2016-12-10 11:16:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

To my knowledge only 10% of the universe is made up of atoms. 90% is consider to be made of dark matter. Dark matter is an issue that is still floating around. Basically it is invisble force that we can not see. This is the theroy that is most popluar today. I would look it up if you like to go into more details.

2006-07-20 11:09:14 · answer #6 · answered by BonLii 1 · 0 0

That is the definition of perfect vacuum. I'm not sure if there is any place in the universe that qualifies, but I'm sure intergalactic space comes pretty damned close.

2006-07-20 11:01:09 · answer #7 · answered by anonymous 2 · 0 0

Well...as far as I know, the "void" that separates planets and celestial bodies is, as the name implies, void. The space between planets, starts and other celestial bodies is completely atom-less.

2006-07-20 11:01:13 · answer #8 · answered by Firefox 4 · 0 0

Outer space has no atoms, just a vacuum.

2006-07-20 11:00:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

dark matter has none. it is on a scale far smaller than the atom. look up the string theory.

2006-07-20 17:26:34 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers