Pirlo was instrumental for Italy in this world cup. He was all around the field and feeded some neat passes to others who converted them into goals. His set-pieces were as brilliant as those of Becksy's and Ronaldinihio's. I really thought he deserved the Golden Ball over others but it was really sad that such a fabulous player missed out on it. If I am not wrong, I don't remember seeing him committing any fouls on others.
2006-07-20 10:42:31 · 16 answers · asked by rumman 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
and yes, I know I lost another 5 points. this is so dumb.
2006-07-20 10:43:16 · update #1
[ Cannavaro was as brilliant as Pirlo but Pirlo was running all around the field and strung the team together]
2006-07-20 11:52:07 · update #2
zizou is the best footballer ever
2006-07-20 10:46:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pirlo was awesome. He actually had two assists in the World Cup finals. Luca Toni's goal was taken away in the second half on a bad offsides call. Reply showed that he wasn't offsides. Film doesn't lie. It was a great pass from Pirlo to Luca Toni setting that up. The pass from Pirlo to Materazzi setting up Italy's goal in the first half was perfect. Pirlo was very consistent just like Cannavaro. Pirlo deserves more respect!
2006-07-20 23:22:20 · answer #2 · answered by Boomer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so, however he did take some really gr8 corners & free kicks, particularly in the finals. I mostly believe that Zidane, Klose & Cannavaro were some of the best players...
2006-07-20 21:48:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the best player was Zidane but you're right. Pirlo played awsome and that's why he's one of my favorite players. I also love Canavarro and the way he plays. And I don't like the fact that people don't really recognize defenders sometimes.
2006-07-20 21:29:44 · answer #4 · answered by superjuicy89 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think NOT!
Zidane was the best, Pirlo and Cannavaro did play well too.
2006-07-20 21:31:54 · answer #5 · answered by Exploradora 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so too. Carnavarro was impressive in the simi's and final, but Pirlo was AWESOME throughout the tourney. Zidane doesn't deserve gold because of the headbutt
2006-07-20 18:36:09 · answer #6 · answered by shassan95 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way, Zidane was the best player in the tournament. He led a bad team to the final. He would have brought them to victory if it wasn't for having a hard head.
2006-07-20 17:57:17 · answer #7 · answered by hardcoco 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep I totally agree with you Pirlo was amazing and this was his first World Cup..
besides the fact he's extremelly hot he's an amazing footballer!
2006-07-20 22:20:01 · answer #8 · answered by мяs. мαтεяαzzι 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i definitely thought cannavaro deserved it. he led his team and prevented many goals because of his amazing defensive skills. he knew what the attackers were going to do before they did.
2006-07-20 18:48:32 · answer #9 · answered by standstill 22 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cannavaro(sorry, ronaldinho is terrible at set-pieces)
2006-07-20 18:45:53 · answer #10 · answered by mark corr 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOOO... KAKA ISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
well hes ma favourite ne way....
i lik pirlo and cannavaro too....
dun lik zidane much
but i think zidane was better den pirlo
2006-07-20 18:43:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋