(someone who can't and don't see things through his eyes)
2006-07-20 08:52:40 · 8 answers · asked by x0_0xx0_0xx0_0x 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
(because I think) We'd better off having a litterally blind president who could see things beyond what it seems like, than a seemingly normal person who see things blindly.
2006-07-20 09:12:08 · update #1
Yes, i say so despite the fact they would need constant help and assistance. It would change the way briefings were presented... the way security was handled. but the fact is the president has someone to cater to all those needs anyway - a cook, a dresser, a chief of state and admin asst, his personal butler, chauffeur, aides to translate today's news into 10 second sound bites etc. Yes, I think a blind person could do it if surrounded by right people.
2006-07-20 08:59:04 · answer #1 · answered by answers999 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't we now, he's blind to the needs of the people of the US
2006-07-20 16:07:06 · answer #2 · answered by Granny 1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL....underagelying -that's good. And I don't see why we can't have a blind president; we had one in a wheelchair.
2006-07-20 15:57:16 · answer #3 · answered by ninusharra 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yess its very possible.. take for an example Bush.. he claims to have seen WMD's in Iraq
2006-07-20 15:56:18 · answer #4 · answered by underagelying 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-07-20 15:59:32 · answer #5 · answered by spatula_warrior 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have one now.
2006-07-20 15:56:44 · answer #6 · answered by cute_ark_girl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We already have one LOLLL
2006-07-20 16:12:44 · answer #7 · answered by Linda 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would be possible but stupid
2006-07-20 15:55:43 · answer #8 · answered by gibberish 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋