I don't think so.
I think Big Ben should have been MVP. The Pistons would have been nothing without wallace.
Who do you think should have been MVP?
2006-07-20 08:51:39 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
Ben wallaces defensive role was as/ if not more important than lebrons offensive role.
2006-07-20 08:56:33 · update #1
when wallace defended against lebron wallace was usually most succesful
2006-07-20 09:00:14 · update #2
Steve Nash is a great player but not MVP for the NBA. I think that Lebron James shows why he is called King James and he should have been MVP in a tie with Dirk and Big Ben. I believe that politics play a big part in sports and the Steve Nash being voted MVP shows it. Why is it that the last white MVP in the league was Larry Bird. I think that the sport writers felt that it had been long overdue for a white MVP when Steve was voted last year also. By the way, I am not racist or prejudice. I just see things for what they really are.
2006-07-20 09:02:12 · answer #1 · answered by darrenhutchinson7 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
certain, he's the leagues maximum powerful participant. no longer the participant that rankings the most or the participant who's the most flashy. without Steve Nash the Suns does no longer be a similar crew. that is as a results of Steve Nash that their run and gun explosive offense works. keep in recommendations the position the Suns the position 3 years in the past before Nash got here. They the position a mediocre crew some stars and good position gamers. Nash has placed them severe into the elite communities of the NBA. he's the only participant in basketball that i visit quite say makes the different participant on his crew extra proper. Kobe Bryant and Gilbert Arenas you could substitute tremendous gamers and get similar outcomes yet you won't be able to substitute Steve Nash and get a similar outcomes. i think if each little thing continues to be a similar and under no circumstances some thing drastically ameliorations Steve Nash will be MVP again this year as he has earned it subsequently far.
2016-10-15 00:33:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Steve Nash deserved the MVP award for carrying his team to the playoffs without Stoudemire. Ben Wallace only defends. So can a ton of other players. And they can get points. SO GET OVER IT. The NBA thinks that Nash deserved the MVP award again and he got it. Ben Wallace didn't even get one point.
2006-07-20 10:21:58 · answer #3 · answered by Einstein 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES. He single handely got them to the playoffs this year, and almost to the Western Conference Finals by himself. He is absolutely remarkable. Big Ben? Heres my final MVP ballot
1. Steve Nash
2. Kobe Bryant
3. Dirk Nowitzki
4. Lebron James
5. Chauncey Billips
6. Tim Duncan
7. Dewayne Wade
8. Ben Wallace (maybe)
2006-07-20 08:56:47 · answer #4 · answered by Taylor C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he should have won it last year, either. AI deserved it in 2004-05 for leading the league in scoring and steals and was 3rd in assists (the first player ever to finish in the top 5 in each of these category in a season), winning the All-Star Game MVP and bringing his team to the playoffs singlehandedly.
This year, LeBron should have won it. He finished the season with 31.4 points, 7 rebounds, 6.6 assists and 1.6 steals per game, joining Oscar Robertson, Jerry West and Michael Jordan as the only players in NBA history to average at least 30 points, 7 rebounds and 6 assists in a single season. James also became the youngest player in NBA history to average at least 30 points per game in a season and the youngest player to win the All-Star Game MVP award, while leading the Cavs to the playoffs for the first time since the 1997-98 season. He was the most complete overall player, and that's the guy who should win the MVP each year.
2006-07-20 11:11:04 · answer #5 · answered by oluciano1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ben Wallace isn't MVP good. It should have been LeBron for sure.
2006-07-20 08:54:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude, you're nuts. Here's Ben's regular season line in the 4 games they played against Cleveland.
36.4 minutes, 47.6% FG, 0% 3-pt, 70.0% FT, 14.5 Rebounds , 2.8 Assists, 1.0 TO, 2.3 Steals, 2.8 Blocks, 2.8 PF, 6.8 PPG
Now, here's LeBron's
40.1 minutes, 45.1% FG, 28.6 3-pt, 78.6 FT 5.8 Rebounds, 5.3 Assits, 3.8 TO, 1.0, Steal, 0.5 Blocks, 1.3 PF, 25.0 PPG.
It was more of the same in the playoffs.The Pistons won 50 games BECAUSE of LeBron and made it to the 2nd round of the playoffs.
2006-07-20 09:20:18 · answer #7 · answered by chairman_of_the_bored_04 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Steve Nash was a good choice IMOH
2006-07-20 08:54:40 · answer #8 · answered by dt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think kobe bryant should have been mvp. and he dosen't get alot of help on his team and he did score 81 points
2006-07-20 11:20:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ofcourse Nash should!
2006-07-20 08:54:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋