RAID-0: This technique has striping but no redundancy of data. It offers the best performance but no fault-tolerance.
So yes you get faster performance with still double the space, but becareful only one drive has to fail to loose all your data so your twice as likely to have that happen.
2006-07-20 08:28:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dane_62 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exacly, its MUCH faster. Exept if 1 drive dies, the other one goes w/ it. You lose all data if 1 drive fails. The computer basicly pretends you have 1 drive with the specs of both of them together :).
Good luck I HIGHLY reccomend raid 0 for gamers!
2006-07-20 08:28:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by PunkinDrublic 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
better performance but no redundant backup.. when you set up your raid array, the byte / block size goes into play as well. the smaller the block size = faster. but your system becomes more prone to hang ups. default is xlnt ,[infomation blocks of 64 bites].and when done you will end up with [my guess] about 297gb
welcome to raid
2006-07-20 09:08:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by bite my shiny metal a** 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I never heard of RAID-O, could you add to your question and explain what that is?
Update: Oh, I see by the answers what it basically is. Doesn't sound like something I would mess with.
2006-07-20 08:28:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by fresh2 4
·
0⤊
1⤋