He did get off afterall ..but something in side of me ........oh i don;t know
2006-07-20 08:09:54 · 20 answers · asked by JJ 7 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Let's think about the evidence:
- There was DNA evidence that he (O.J.) was at the scene (his hairs were on Goldman's body),
- There was evidence that he had Ronald Goldman & Nicole Brown's blood in his car (from a glove that "didn't fit him")
- Fresh cuts on O.J.s left hand
- O.J.'s blood type at murder scene
- bloody footprints at murder scene were from size 12 Magli shoe, same found in Bronco. Simpson wore size 12 Magli shoes.
- O.J confessed while an inmate to Rosie Grier (this evidence wasn't admitted in court)
Finally, consider that while he wasn't convicted in the criminal trial, a civil jury awarded damages from O.J. to the Brown and Goldman families.
Did O.J. do it? Absolutely, yes. The only mistake was on the part of the prosecution and judge for allowing that case to be turned into a circus.
2006-07-20 08:54:50 · answer #1 · answered by Helpful guy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Listen the jury didn't find him "innocent" they found him "not guilty" - there is a significant difference. Very expert and solid testimony showed that the LA police planted the bloody glove, they planted the bloody sock, they planted blood traces, they "doctored" DNA samples, they lied about why they went over the wall at Rockingham. That jury did an excellent job. They decided that once the police start framing someone you HAVE TO question their whole case. Its just so morally repugnant to convict with solid evidence of a frame up.
That said, did he do it? Damn straight he did it! Like the comedian said on Leno:
"The LAPD, the only police department in the world, so incompetent they couldn't even frame a guilty man!"
2006-07-20 21:43:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
uhm let's see, children won't have anything to do with him, he was sued and losyt in a civil lawsuit, he never tried to sue LA County for false arrest, defamation of character, libel, slander, yada, yada...all the other things that go along with being falsely accused. Do the arthmetic. He's guilty as sin..how many corporations are willing to hire him? Everybody knows he did it...including his own children. Just because his attorneys played the game a bit better than city employees does NOT make him innocent...er NOT guilty...think a man like that would get in a car and lead police on a low speed "chase" if he was NOT guilty? no need!
2006-07-20 16:09:29 · answer #3 · answered by Marlin Darlin 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't see how anyone can explain away the evidence in order to get to the result that he didn't do it. It's possible to make mistakes with DNA, but it's not really possible to make a mistake with DNA that results in exact matches with a defendant and a victim.
But the jury was supposed to acquit if they felt reasonable doubt. And I guess, in all the confusion, they had that. So they did what they were instructed to do.
2006-07-20 15:46:18 · answer #4 · answered by A B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a question:
Does anyone know who Lizzie Borden was?
And If you said, she killed her family.
Guess what? According to the law you'd be wrong! Because she was found non-guilty
But just as it will be with OJ, history proved the jury was wrong and Lizzie Borden did if fact killed her family.
Also according to Robert Ressler and John Douglas (not only FBI Profilers but the founders of Profiling itself... John Douglas actually coined the phrase "serial killer") BOTH believe without a doubt OJ Did It.
Robert Ressler actual said he'd bet his 30 year career on it.
2006-07-20 15:26:32 · answer #5 · answered by ma_zila 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To this day, I don't understand how the jury thought he had nothing to do with it. His fame and fortune got in the way of the murder of a mother or 2 young children and her friend. It's so sad
The American justice system can be so embarrassing and sadly stupid.
2006-07-20 15:15:30 · answer #6 · answered by jack russell girl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he was guilty, but the jury was probably afraid of a national up rising if he was found guilty. The defense played the race card.
2006-07-20 15:14:49 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that happen like a decade or so ago,you just realised it? hehe.Well of course he's guilty you could have tell by his body language,but you know he was rich and and african american at that so I guess they make those kinda people slide by.He might have slid by the earthly judgement but I bet he won't the eternal heavenly one that awaits.
2006-07-20 15:15:10 · answer #8 · answered by I-C-U 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a huge #32 USC Fan. With that being said, even I can't see how he was let go. I think he did it.
2006-07-20 15:13:08 · answer #9 · answered by sobay310 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only mistake, was him being acquitted!!! He!! yeah he did it!!! At least we all know a good lawyer to use if we ever f*ck up!!
2006-07-20 15:28:37 · answer #10 · answered by Jenintn 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋