2006-07-20 08:02:48 · 11 answers · asked by jitwitit 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
Some people gave some really dense answers. THanks to those of you who actually gave some kind of soluable info. If you don't know, or have never heard any embelishment on the su
2006-07-20 12:32:29 · update #1
Some people gave some really dense answers. THanks to those of you who actually gave some kind of soluable info. If you don't know, or have never heard any embelishment on the subject, don't bother. It helps to hear everything anyone has heard, then you get a good idea of whether or not it MIGHT have some kind of fact. Geez, where are the history buffs?
2006-07-20 12:33:46 · update #2
The Aztecs sacrificed one person, every hour, on the hour. so around 92 in 4 days. They sacrificed them by pulling the still beating heart from the victims chest and lighting it on fire. Victims usually died from blood loss, entering shock, or actually having their heart burned while they were still alive.
2006-07-20 08:04:25 · answer #1 · answered by Grin Reeper 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Aztecs sacrificed one person, every hour, on the hour. so around 92 in 4 days. They sacrificed them by pulling the still beating heart from the victims chest and lighting it on fire. Victims usually died from blood loss, entering shock, or actually having their heart burned while they were still alive.
2006-07-20 15:07:19 · answer #2 · answered by Hunter S. Thompson 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Aztecs liked to sacrifice people but they didn't kill nearly as many as the Spanish did when they invaded there lands.
2006-07-20 15:21:47 · answer #3 · answered by Nat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Check it out--Discovery Channel's Unsolved History proved that the forensics and the logistics are possible for this to have happened:
http://shopping.discovery.com/product-54924.html
2006-07-20 15:07:15 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Anonymous 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that was the Inca in Peru, not the Aztecs.
2006-07-20 15:06:04 · answer #5 · answered by Dumaflatchey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
now how could any of us prove that. Thats why its called a MYTH
Re phrase the question.
I hope you know that you are going to get some tough answers to this one.
2006-07-20 15:04:22 · answer #6 · answered by Xae 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I talked to this Aztec guy, and he said it was only 18,453 people. Sorry.
2006-07-20 15:05:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess we will never reeally be sure of anything that really happened in the past
2006-07-20 15:05:50 · answer #8 · answered by musiclover 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A myth is a myth, however, it cannot be proven by me, because i was not there 20,00o yrs ago... unless there is archaeological evidence
2006-07-20 15:07:25 · answer #9 · answered by mercy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.. it could be more too.
well., there were lots of slaves when you win a war.. all those loosers are ur slaves and they have to do what you say.
so its possible.
2006-07-20 15:06:50 · answer #10 · answered by juljulabie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋