Should USA intervein the latest conflict in the middle east.
2006-07-20 07:48:37 · 10 answers · asked by doubleclick 2 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
If we are just going to choose a side (like Congress seems to want to do), I say we are better off staying out. If we are going to go in and disarm both sides, Israel and Hezbollah, I am all for intervention.
If we did go in backing Israel alone, it would only provoke the terrorist organizations and other nations in the area, especially if we help Israel take control of Lebanon like they are trying. If its one thing foreign nations learned from Bush, its that preemtion is a valid way to conduct "diplomacy"...
2006-07-20 07:51:23 · answer #1 · answered by John J 6 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Iraq is a political melting pot for much better than purely Iraq. Iran, Egypt, and Syria all have pastimes contained in the section as can we and our allies. the way ahead for Iraq, hence, has concerning much better than purely Iraq. it truly is a seize-22 challenge, and assorted ideas purely bring about us being decrease back over there in a short era of time. the straightforward reality is that Iraq can don't have any probabilities of lengthy time period-stability see you later because the completed region remains risky. the frenzy for the withdraw is, in my view, subsequently of human beings purely wanting it to be over, no longer because some thing is in a position to ensue. And on the present route and frame of mind there'll under no circumstances be a time once shall we go away because Iraq is waiting, Iraq isn't the issue. Crime and terrorism flooding by potential of it is borders each day is the issue. Is it the worst overseas coverage mistake ever? it is actual on par with the stupidest. We engaged in warfare with a guy who became actual a stabilizing rigidity contained in the region, we assumed that warfare may end including his authorities (highlighting our lack of expertise of the life-style), and we had no plan at inquisitive about a withdraw. there have been no targets for the warfare firstly, or none that were a chance. (you could't finished an action in protecting with a lie.) no remember what occurs right here destiny generations will choose us harshly. no longer purely American generations, international generations. It became a stupid flow without element in any respect, and has finished no longer some thing yet tank distinctive economies and allow us to witness first hand the destruction of a way of existence.
2016-12-02 00:16:40 · answer #2 · answered by peentu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not our war. Stay out. Haven't we learned enough about failing internationally with Iraq, Iran and North Korea, not to mention Vietnam?
2006-07-20 07:53:06 · answer #3 · answered by commonsense 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think we could. We have already struck out nose in the wrong place, now it's getting bitten.
The enemy was always Iran, and Iraq kept Iran in check. We freed Iran from Iraq.
Big surprise? I don't think so.
2006-07-20 11:50:09 · answer #4 · answered by timer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absofrickenlutely!! Haven't we got enough going on? Most definitely the U. S. should mind it's own P's & Q's.
2006-07-20 08:08:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, we should stay out. If Syria or Iran get's involved though then we should get involved and wipe them out while we can.
2006-07-20 07:50:34 · answer #6 · answered by skifaster66 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Israel doesnt ask for help, stay out of their way.
2006-07-20 07:51:35 · answer #7 · answered by jack f 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets get out for good. Let them fight.
2006-07-20 07:55:47 · answer #8 · answered by broj7400 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES we are not the world's babysitters.
2006-07-20 07:52:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We should be there. It is our duty.
2006-07-20 07:51:38 · answer #10 · answered by Maedhros 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋