English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

you are starving, and the only food available is the body of your close friend or relative. they are dead. would you eat them so you can survive, or not and die?

2006-07-20 07:38:46 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Other - Social Science

15 answers

Simple answer...yes. I mean, no point in having more people die than necessary. Yes, it seems inhumane, but I'm pretty sure the dead person wouldn't mind(esp if it was a relative or close friend..they'd want you to try to live by whatever means necessary). But what an awful thing to have to think about doing. But one must do what is needed to survive.

2006-07-20 07:43:15 · answer #1 · answered by Sarah T 2 · 0 1

If that was the only option then you are likely going to die anyway and you will only prolong your own suffering. Just about anywhere there are things that can be eaten, they may not have a lot of nutritional value, but as long as there is any plant life there is a chance you could survive, so then there would be no need to eat your friend/relative.

2006-07-20 07:46:44 · answer #2 · answered by Lady 5 · 0 0

people invented agriculture about 10,000 years interior the previous it really is as rapidly as everyone all started ingesting grains, interior the previous that we ate meat and wild end result and vegetables. there's a lot more suitable history as rapidly as we ate in this 'caveman' way, and performance truly been ingesting agriculturally for an somewhat short quantity of time, evolutionary talking. we do not may favor to eat meat lately, it somewhat is actual. yet we received't deny that meat ingesting is a important ingredient of out organic and organic and organic and organic historic previous. And there are arguments round that the red meat ingesting is what made us so smart and able to stay with equipment.

2016-12-10 12:30:38 · answer #3 · answered by moncalieri 4 · 0 0

people will say I'd rather die but honestly you can never be sure in that kinda situation. I would like to say I would not but chances are in a crazed state of mind it could happen

2006-07-20 07:59:23 · answer #4 · answered by momie_2bee 5 · 0 0

if they are already dead, then yes. it would be emotionally difficult, but once it "cut" and cooked over the campfire, it probably tastes like beef, only tough and gamey, i would think. If they were dead, and their spirits looking down on me, wouldn't they want me to survive?

2006-07-20 07:45:17 · answer #5 · answered by coloradosnoflake2 4 · 0 0

We all know this has happened and I don't think we can know what we would do in that situation. I would really have to pray about it. Starvation is a horrible way to die.

2006-07-20 07:44:49 · answer #6 · answered by gone 3 · 0 0

Absolutely. I love steak, ribs, and bbq. I cook 'em up....season them with some spice and bbq sauce and LIVE! I might even develop a taste for it and make it a recurring dish on my menu.

2006-07-20 07:44:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think i rather die then have to eat my frenz or my relatives body....would u???

2006-07-20 07:43:26 · answer #8 · answered by azizah2minnie 2 · 0 0

I don't know. It's hard to give a definite answer to a hypothetical situation.

2006-07-20 10:15:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

we as humans want to live onward and so of us
will do anything to survive.But me,I wouldn't try anything live take anothers life.To answer I would do it even thought I'll most likely scar me
for decades to come

2006-07-20 08:39:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers