Law schools are primarily interested in recommendations that come from professors who know the student and his/her academic work, as well as from employers who can write about the factors noted below. They are interested in summary estimates of the candidate's general promise as a student of law. The more the evaluation reflects real knowledge of the student and his/her performance, the more useful the letter is to the law school's admissions committee and thus to the student. Indicate how long you have known the applicant and in what capacity. It should address the following questions:
* Personal effectiveness: Is the applicant the kind of person you would choose to consult as a lawyer? Does the applicant enjoy the trust and respect of professors and fellow students?
* Intellectual qualifications: What is your assessment of the applicant's analytical skills and ability to grasp new ideas? Has the applicant's academic record been affected by any special circumstances such as work, social or academic background? What is the applicant's ability to deal with complex or abstract matters?
* Ability to communicate: Is the applicant an effective writer? Does the written work submitted demonstrate a mastery of the conventions of English? Is the written expression clear, well-organized and forceful? Is the applicant articulate in oral expression?
* Industry and self-discipline: To what extent does the applicant possess the traits of persistence, efficiency and motivation? Is there any reason to doubt the applicant's commitment to law study or the applicant's diligence as a student?
* Potential for the study of law: What is your prediction of the applicant's probable performance in the study of law? Would the applicant stand in the top quarter, near mid-class or simply make the grade in a rigorous program? Do you have any special familiarity with the process of legal education?
* Is there any other information about the applicant which you would like to share with admissions committees?
You need 3.
2006-07-20 09:43:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Expert Answers™ 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
First off, most schools have guidelines that tell you how many to submit, and won't care if you submit any more. Generally that number is three. So don't worry about quantity, it always comes down to quality.
Second, the rules for where the letters come from are somewhat flexible: If you can get oh say two good letters from an internship, even if the school you're applying to says two out of the three must be from professors, they generally won't care. But that's not to say get all three from an internship mentor, since that will make the admissions department wonder why you can't seem to interact with academia faculty at all.
Finally, see if your school has some sort of "Letter Service", where you can submit letters to them, keep the letters confidential, and then send as many duplicate copies of those letters out to various schools as you want. This type of service is generally very helpful and keeps from irking your letter writers since they only need to write and seal one copy.
2006-07-20 07:33:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by ymingy@sbcglobal.net 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
2 or 3. Schools are very specific about how many they want: sending them more (or less) shows that you can't read the fine print, which is no good if you want to go into law.
2006-07-20 07:31:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by angrysandwichguy2006 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
At a minimum 23, but most say you should get around 47 to be successful.
2006-07-20 07:32:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would get several. Get some from employers, professors and extracurricular supervisors. Aim to have 3-5 and assign them accordingly.
2014-01-12 16:09:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by wbaseball4ever 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
as far as i comprehend, maximum individuals get professors to position in writing them letters of advice, and infrequently employers. they could surely require some thing like 2 out of three letters to be out of your professors, with the different one as a lot as you... a minimum of I surely have study that at certain faculties' admission web content. besides, in order to have the acceptable shot at a tremendous letter of advice, you may want to attempt to make friends with your professors, or a minimum of advance somewhat deeper courting than only exhibiting as a lot as their class. it will be a superficial courting certain, yet you may want to play the game in case you go with regulation faculties to take you heavily. i do not opt to deter you, yet a three.3 GPA may be somewhat low for tier one, depending of route on what college you're graduating from (like it or no longer, the admissions committees have a tendency to position a significantly better cost on extra prestigious universities). you honestly favor to spotlight getting a killer LSAT score, and acceptable letters of advice. in case you could, it may help you a lot in case you're taking a graduate factor class or 2 on your major, and then get the letters from the professors who coach those courses. Taking better factor instructions shows the regulation faculties you're waiting for some heavy coursework. i'm no longer certain on the own statement, yet i'm prepared to wager GPA/LSAT is weighted the heaviest of their admission determination (used as an initial show screen), noted by using the letters of advice, and then the own statement. of route your plan is to easily do as acceptable you could on each. good success.
2016-10-15 00:27:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that you should get as many as you can, but just make sure that they are not from too many family members.
2006-07-20 07:33:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nanners 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not quite sure, but I think about 3.
2006-07-20 07:30:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
as many as you can
never hurts to have a lot
2006-07-20 07:41:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I had five for my teaching interview. I would say no more than five, no fewer than three.
good luck!
2006-07-20 07:31:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Adje J 3
·
0⤊
0⤋