"Save the babies!!" They wail and wail.But after they are born,the Republicans who "save" them vote to cut programs to help poor kids.
It is hypocritical.Look at this e-mail from a good pro-life chtistian":
From: screwedbytheleft
Subject: Yes, as a matter of fact "******" is a word it means:
Message: Get the **** out of my paycheck you turdmonkey. I don't want to pay for your abortions, your meds, your hemorroid treatments, your ******* housing, or childcare expenses. The only thing the gov't should be spending taxes on is defending this nation. Whether in Iraq, Iran, our the city of Berkeley.
Dont tell me.Tell the kids.
Turns out they are not pro-life,they are pro-birth.
This finally prooves it.
2006-07-20
07:03:47
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
As usual most people are too retarded too provide anthying even remotely resembling an answrer.
2006-07-20
07:10:51 ·
update #1
You make a good argument for abortion. Don't have them if you can't afford to feed them.
2006-07-20 07:13:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by nimbleminx 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Honestly, it's the liberals who put educating some kids on the proper methods of fisting along with other forms of casual sexual encounters into our schools. Had you all kept your liberal wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am ideas of responsible sex out of the lives of children, then maybe abortion wouldn't be such a big issue. Nor would popping out kids that the parents can't support. I just don't see where any of that is insensitive. Liberals made the mess and now you want everyone to mop it up.
2006-07-20 07:16:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by kathy059 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, the are PRO-PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. Meaning, make your choices, live wisely, and don't expect me to support your skanky lifestyle be it by paying for your abortion OR paying for your kids.
BTW, nothing in that message indicates that this person is a pro-life Christian.
PS: I think I am in love with "screwedbytheleft"
2006-07-20 07:07:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Goose&Tonic 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL. Thanks for posting my e-mail to you. LOL.
I love your feeble attempt at linking abortion to my lack of desire to economically support you and your offsprings, because as we all know, I forced you to insert your penis into a woman's vagina, ejaculate your sperm and not have thought in advance the consequences of your 30 seconds of fun.
Yes, I am not for unlimited abortion (WHAT?????, Did I just say that????), but I will gladly pay for a child's welfare when in custody of the state. However, you are the degenerate anal drip that EXPECTS and DEMANDS that we also pay for YOUR carelessness and just hand you money and pay for the caring of your children, hence MILLIONAIRES in California demanding universal child-care, even if most families don't need it, but of course, you won't see these millionaires emptying up their accoutns into the California state treasury.
You want me to pay for your child's welfare, fine, turn them into CPS (they probably will be better off). Otherwise, stay out of my goddam wallet.
Unbelievable.
2006-07-20 07:15:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know the type. Like the government would reduce their taxes if it didn't spend it on babies or whatever.
These are very selfish people all down the line.
2006-07-20 07:10:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by sonyack 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No... it doesn't prove your point....sorry to disappoint you.
Look. Pro-lifers (political conservatives in this case) believe government cannot take money away from my pay check and pay for someone else's hospital care.
Do you want gov. to take 70% of your pay check and spend your hard earned money on welfare and gov programs ???
2006-07-20 07:11:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by American Superman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I got a nasty hatefilled e-mail from 'screwedbytheleft' after I simply, politely reminded him I wasn't even a Liberal. That I'm a voting Moderate.
2006-07-20 07:12:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Doc Watson 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am pro-life and I got a hatemail from a coward who said that he wouldn't burn my Church but would stand there a laugh while someone else did. I comes from both sides.
2006-07-20 07:07:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with you that Pro Lifers are hypocritical.But,we shouldn't give them free publicity.If you ignore them,they will go away.
2006-07-20 07:10:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by kathy6500 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess you are too retarded to know the difference between to and too.
2006-07-20 07:29:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Phil My Crack In 4
·
0⤊
0⤋