They must keep in mind the election will be determined by moderates. Their name calling and lack of a platform (just being "for" something is NOT a plan) will betheir continued downfall.
3. They don't have the nuts to do 1 or 2
2006-07-20 07:00:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
If a Republican or neo-con actually won the election, i would live with it, however, Bush didn't win either election. If you look at all the evidence, objectively, and see the truth, and still have no problem with the facts, i.e. that Bush didn't win either time, then you don't deserve to live in a free Republic and you should be the one to leave.
Real Americans don't run, they fight for their rights, and for justice. It's really sad that even if you like Bush, you should have a problem with the way he was installed into power. He was never elected, and no matter what you think, the evidence speaks far louder than your ignorance of the truth.
2006-07-20 07:05:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by vertical732 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
@ Dodgerblue,a hooker has better morals than Bush and his acquaintances will ever have. you've were given to be f*cking kidding me in case you're saying in the different case Bush is one in each and every of,if no longer, the worst president in American historic previous. it is f*cking disgusting that individuals nevertheless imagine he's giant like one in each and every of my chum's acquaintances. when I heard that, i became purely bowled over? What individual of their top suggestions may say that Bush is "no longer so undesirable". The monetary equipment is in a disaster He did not even care about New Orleans 8 million each and every individual is unemployed on the point of fifty million human beings don't have any healthcare, and those that do have crap healthcare because the agencies may quite make salary than save lives each and every individual is going to lose their homes The warfare has placed American in 1000000000000 dollor deficit you understand what i imagine Bush does contained in the workplace. sit down round and play with toys. i quite imagine he does. And he quite is stupid and that i do not propose stupid like say if Kerry became president, and he exceeded a regulation that each and each and every individual may say, "Oh what's he stupid or some thing.That became so dumb". No I propose Bush lacks the mind ability to do some thing wise. the only occupation he ought to have after his time period in workplace is being a comic. He can tell redneck jokes
2016-12-02 00:13:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I choose answer 3. I have heard #1 before and it didn't happen. Answer #2 - Dubya pushed 2 conservative supreme court judges that will throw out their frivolous lawsuit.
2006-07-20 07:01:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by therandman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
4. None of the above. Liberalism=Tolerance
2006-07-20 07:26:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by cindy c 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Answer 1 would be nice
2006-07-20 06:57:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by izombix 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We will work harder to save our once-great nation from the forces of greed, wreckless imperialism and constitutional evil.
2006-07-20 07:12:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by ideogenetic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 would be great.
But they arent going to Australia. They side with US, And now laughingly so does Canada.
France still sux so go for it
2006-07-20 07:00:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by smitty031 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let me see if I've got this right:ALL you do is live in a right-wing dreamworld? Get a life.
Republicans NEVER do anything wrong(wink wink). LOL
2006-07-20 06:59:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
4. Their heads will explode like the Martians' in "Mars Attacks!"
2006-07-20 07:24:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋