And it was ok for him to enact emergency laws for Terri Schievo, and it was ok for him to do nothing for days after Katrina struck and why is it ok for him to deny funding for stem cells even though 75% of people want funding? Why is it ok for him to tap my phone calls and keep a record of my calls? Why can Bush refuse to go under oath about 9/11? Why were people turned away in black communities in the 2000 elections with a "Scrub List" made by Kathren Harris, Florida Secretary of State and Bush's state campaign co-chairwoman? Why is clinton blamed for all of the problems in the last 5 years, but Bush isn't? Why did what the Project For a New American Century want in Iraq come true after Bush got into office, and why did Saddam become a threat so quickly after Bush took office?
My final question:
If Bush is such a great leader, why does so much bad "stuff" happen under his administration?
2006-07-20
06:53:47
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Wow, maybe you should have posted those seperate. You have given me enough material to have my head explode ten times. So instead of writing a book I'll keep it short and sweet.
Bush sat in that class room instead of rushing out and scaring every child when there was nothing he could do at that moment.
Terri Schievo's husband was awarded a huge sum of money from the accident to help her rehabilitate, and then immediately put her in a hospice and tried (or succeeded) to kill her.
No president in history has micro managed the emergency efforts of natural disasters. That is the Mayors responsibility, because he/she knows the local economy.
Bush does not want tax dollars going to support stem cell research so abortions will not become a supply and demand structure. Every time Americans vote on abortion they vote it down(except when the mother's life is in jeopardy).
The government has been tapping phone lines since the phone was practically invented(or just tapping technology) to catch mobsters mainly. All Bush did was allow international tapping for terrorists.
The president is not required to go under oath unless charges are brought up against him. That usually takes just cause and evidence.
The votes in Florida in 2000 were recounted and gore was not ahead any of the final numbers. By the way the military vote was not counted for Florida residents serving over seas, the millitary vote's aprox 70% Bush.
Try surveying how many times the media references Bush in the last five years about anything negative. then compare it to Clinton for... well you can go back as far as you want I guarantee Bush is blamed more.
"Suddam has weapons of mass destruction"Who is this quote?...............Answer Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, George Bush and pretty much the rest of the free world which does not include germany, france, and russia. Also on june 22 2006 declassified information, over 500 weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq since 2003.
You did ask one good question though, there is alot of bad "stuff" that has happened under George W Bush's administration, So thank God we have such a great leader.
2006-07-20 08:01:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by chris b 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush is one of the greatest leader in world history. If you look at the FBI under hoover you phone and everything else was being watch and if you have nothing to hind for the government then why did you care. Why do you want bush to go under oath? He is going to said the same thing and everyone else. There is not way to prove the black communities was turn down. Saddam has been a treat to American since the 80's. If Clinton thought so. Look at operation fox
2006-07-21 09:55:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow what a bunch of thinkers. "He’s stupid". That’s pretty deep.
Chris B is the only real answer to your question. And since it's the only answer that is truthful, you'll certainly dismiss it and turn Air America back on to get your next set of talking points to throw on here>? Don't ask questions if you really don't want the answers. Ignorance is not a virtue. This question is precisely why Democrats aren't in the white house.
2006-07-20 11:06:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by stratmagic 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
very good point ,employment is not as low as the record show ..People over 45 years old just gave up looking for Job nobody will hired them.Bank are giving out homes loans yes for the foreclosures is high (in Ohio).wages are down.Health insurance is high Poor children lost health care.His on child left behind is a joke.He done nothing to stop abortion
2006-07-20 07:13:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bad stuff has happened under EVERY administration.
Good stuff too.
Look carefully and you will see there really is not much difference between republican and democrat administrations.
Grow up, the world is a complicated place Tyler.
2006-07-20 06:58:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by aka DarthDad 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
7 min. to think about how to react after 9-11 isn't too bad...
that is unless you are a liberal who hate Bush for everything that's wrong in the universe.
2006-07-20 06:59:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by American Superman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The die hard Bushies forgive him for everything and anything and blame Clinton for everything and anything even though Bush has been in office for five years.
2006-07-20 06:58:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Could you try asking one or two questions at a time so you can get helpful feedback? Don't get me wrong, insightful analysis like, "Bush sucks....I can't stand him" are great, but if you are actually looking for truth, not opinions, please rephrase.
2006-07-21 12:28:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Up and Adam 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
explain in literal english what "stuff" you mean?
like higher incomes
most minority home ownership ever
no attacks on US soil since 911
winning the war on terror
taxation is down
low unemployment
a strong military.
Like that "stuff"???
2006-07-20 06:57:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by smitty031 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agrre
clinton was a good president
sure he screwed up but when he was Prezz....unemplyment was very low
bush sucks...i cant stand him
2006-07-20 06:58:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋