Who believes that the UN have no purpose because they have no power and no authority to do anything...?
2006-07-20 05:43:23 · 16 answers · asked by BEE Eater 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Like many liberal, socialist ideals...the UN is a nice idea...but in practice, it doesn't work. They are a huge beaurocracy and nothing gets done. Any large organization is going to be like that (especially governments...like the US government)
2006-07-20 05:54:01 · answer #1 · answered by redfernkitty 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has did not stay away from all wars. even if it may follow rigidity and frequently shorten conflicts. it ought to have succeeded yet regrettably the right of veto by skill of the everlasting participants of the protection council ensured that it won't be able to make a ruling antagonistic to any us of a it somewhat is a customer state of a lasting member. It has executed a staggering job of highlighting complications as they take position even if it really is a touch short on techniques. Bosnia as an instance is an section the position the UN must have executed so a lot more suitable. It replaced into excellent at your doorstep of properly educated and properly geared up armies who sat lower back and watched the massacres because the right of veto interior the protection council prevented any functional action till the concern were given so undesirable that action replaced into inevitable. that is been very useful in lot of techniques UNHCR is a staggering agency that has tried and succeeded in saving lot of lives.not as many because it may loved to have, yet how are you going to feed refugees once you're lower than hearth. i recognize a large style of people don't like the UN yet in the experience that they can advise a more suitable useful option i'd be prepared to take heed to. Do as us of a of america tells you isn't an option.
2016-12-10 12:27:15 · answer #2 · answered by moncalieri 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Originally the UN was formed to prevent wars like WWII... it replaces The NS (nations society or community) who was created to avoid wars like WWI. But the NS didn't work since Hitler was able to invade Poland with no reaction or whatsoever from the NS.
Usually the UN has to achieve a diplomatic solution before any armed conflict does begin ( ... remember the missile crisis in Cuba?), they can also fine country's or implement an economic blockade, and send the UN armed forces the blue helmets (not offensive forces)... The UN can also ask the allied army to strike certain places when the conflict is really nasty (offensive forces)...
Personally I don't think the UN is working right since 2001... the UN should avoid wars like the one Israel is delivering over Lebanon, but I don't see any progress in this particular issue
2006-07-20 06:11:34 · answer #3 · answered by Shinny 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The purpose of the United Nations is to bring all nations of the world together to work for peace and development, based on the principles of justice, human dignity and the well-being of all people. It affords the opportunity for countries to balance global interdependence and national interests when addressing international problems.
The power of the United Nations does not reside within the law of each individual nation, but rather the impact of a unified front against a nation that is ignoring international laws and practices.
2006-07-20 05:47:47 · answer #4 · answered by InfoJunkie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't really add anything to what has already been said. The United Nations is an organization who's main goal is to bring the entire world under one socialist government which would have no right to due process, no freedom of religion, no freedom of speech, and a judicial system where the judges are not accountable.
2006-07-20 06:38:58 · answer #5 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The UN has no power. I think we keep them around because they are funny to watch squabble over things they have no authority to fix. And they can make things the US does seem more legitamate and we can also just ignor them w/o reprocussions. If we left they would just disspand.
2006-07-20 05:48:52 · answer #6 · answered by kyle3om 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The UN is a great place for dictators, tyrants and communist whack-jobs to congregate, ponder how they can undermine democracy and confiscate the wealth of nations that actually do things, make products, contribute to mankind's knowledge and don't run around half-naked, barking at the moon.
2006-07-20 06:12:08 · answer #7 · answered by Annoying American 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the un was made up of countries that want a better world and are under thier own contract to come to the aid of any nation that is a member that is attacked by a nation that is not a member,, like a big gang
2006-07-20 05:47:46 · answer #8 · answered by scottfamilytribe 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion the UN means Unprotected Nations.Becausa so far they couldn't help any one.If you compare the money they spend for meetings and around the world traveling,you can feed lot of people in african countries who are suffering for lack of food and other things.Actualy speaking its a complete waste of money.
2006-07-20 06:03:32 · answer #9 · answered by anjelniki 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Got me"......now, more than ever, we need a strong U.N., but
once again, has let me down. What they were developed for
was, at one time, very noble. But, to get in the way of warring
factions is not a good idea. That's like the U.N. telling the
"north" to stop fighting the "south" ! I just hope that cooler heads
prevail with this conflict and maybe, just maybe Condy Rice
can help. We can hope.
2006-07-20 05:56:11 · answer #10 · answered by babo02350 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋