so they can justify illegal surveillance on them, and then imprison them without charge, so they can't vote, and the conservatives can steal another election? I thought it was funny...
2006-07-20 05:09:53 · 12 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
um...hmmmmm..I was born on this planet in this country, where we can hold suspected terrorists without charge. Am I the only one paying attention here? sheesh
2006-07-20 05:21:48 · update #1
another hate tactic by the conservatives
2006-07-20 05:19:21 · answer #1 · answered by david c 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
A person cannot be imprisoned without a charge. I am an independent, I am neither conservative nor liberal. Where are you getting your information from? In my opinion, if putting people under surveillance will stop certain acts of terrorism, I am all for it. As for stealing an election. There is really no proof of this. It is all hear say. I say show me some facts, then I will believe it.
2006-07-20 05:15:16 · answer #2 · answered by brandi91980 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about the first question, but I can definitely answer an emphatic NO to your second question. However, your fear talk to support your first question is funny considering that the surveillance has been deemed legal, there aren't people being imprisoned without charge and certainly not to keep them from voting and no one has stolen any election (proof has been repeatedly given). Hehe, but definitely a big no on the second question.
2006-07-20 05:33:42 · answer #3 · answered by Donut44 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing funny about the use of demonization to do in the opposition to your views irregardless of your side of the issue. This is sophistry to justify political beliefs which should be argued using facts and reasons, not empty, illogical labels. If you have the time, see my website for better phrased, more objectively asked Q's about the ideological clash between Liberals and Conservatives.
2006-07-20 05:23:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've actually never heard anyone call liberals terrorists. The worse I hear sometimes is "terrorist sympathizer." But that's only the minority (Ann Coulter types) of conservatives. That's pretty bad, but not anywhere near the level you describe.
2006-07-20 05:18:59 · answer #5 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
with a view to efficiently combat something, people might desire to be keen to call them what they are. Shouting Allah Akbar earlier killing a team of unarmed people defines Hasan as a terrorist. in simple terms taking pictures people defines him as a murderer. real now I truthfully have so little faith in our united states of america, I question the integrity of the FBI. between the excuses being grew to become into they initially reported he wasn't a terrorist seconds after the attack got here approximately. How might they comprehend?
2016-11-02 10:05:48 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reds call everyone a terrorist
Last time I heard there is a terrorist hiding under every Redpublican bed
2006-07-20 05:23:51 · answer #7 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No just useless pustules in the world.
2006-07-20 05:13:03 · answer #8 · answered by hexa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! Liberals aren't smart enough to be terrorists. We call them STUPID!!
2006-07-20 05:14:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You libs are so big on conspiracys, what planet were you born on?
2006-07-20 05:11:57 · answer #10 · answered by Phil My Crack In 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
liberals just want to help people
why does that upset you so much
2006-07-20 05:36:21 · answer #11 · answered by Antonis P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋