I saw a Discovery Channel show about it. They claim that the flag flapped in the breeze when it was planted. (It was made to stick out, and according to Buzz Aldrin, it only moved when the astronauts moved it.) The angles of the shadows of the different rocks in pictures are different, so they must have had several lights (The crew recreated the scene on Earth, and the angles were different with just one light source here, too). You can't see the stars in the pictures, so it must have taken place on a soundstage (The crew took pictures outside on Earth with both modern cameras and the ones they had then--it was so dark you couldn't see the stars in the background with either camera). The astronauts' cameras were made so that they couldn't come up with any pictures that would have been as good as the ones we got (They also used the old cameras, and the pictures came out fine). We simply didn't have the technology (we had enough for atomic bombs and advanced weaponry--who says? Especially when the whole country was going great guns to get it to work). I don't think any of their arguments hold up--the Russians had satellites all over the place, and we weren't exactly quiet about when we went up, so they would have had everything they had trained on us to make sure we weren't making it up. Talk about a coup for them during the Cold War if they could have proven we didn't do it, and they never challenged it.
2006-07-20 07:51:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by cross-stitch kelly 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's understandable when you consider that the U S Government has lied about so many other things isn't it? Remember that, at the time, the space race was hotting up and the Cold War was at it's height. The flight to the moon would prove which side had the best technology and, by inference, the best weapons. Fortunately the west won and eventually communism crumbled.
However, just on the physical landing. Then surely all the tracking devices all over the world couldn't have been fooled. The Russians certainly knew that the landing was genuine and near where i live in England is Jodrell Bank, one of the most advanced radio telescopes in the world. They tracked the landing and broadcast it. Unfortunately Hollywood got hold of the idea and made a film that showed a fake landing, was it The Gemini Project, or something like it?
2006-07-20 05:57:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by quatt47 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They claim that shadows are pointing in the wrong direction on the moon landing pictures. One has a "c" on a rock they believe means it it was a prop. The fact is most pictures are actually multiple shots pasted together. Everything has a reasonable explanation.
The bottom line is there are some really genuinely weird stuff out there. But things like this can always be shown to be a conspiracy if someone puts enough energy into "finding" something.
2006-07-20 05:07:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Fantasy Girl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because people love to believe conspiracy theories, to question the "official" events, be it the moon landing, JFK, 9/11, or most anything.
Here's the best list of theories and debunking of them on the Internet : http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
2006-07-20 05:05:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by rahidz2003 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just conspiracy theories. They'll point to how the flag stuck straight out, but it turns out there was a horizontal pole holding it up that way. Little stuff like that. If you ask me, it happened, and people will make up conspiracy theories about Mother Theresa if you suggest it to them. Crazy, huh?
2006-07-20 05:08:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by locolady98 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I watched a show about it a long time ago and from they said they "staged" it because it was too expensive to do it for real, it couldn't be done, and they believe it was a hoax because of the waving flag (outer space doesn't have wind) on the moon.
2006-07-20 05:07:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
ok, I watched the completed component. What a collection of horsepucky! no longer interior the least bit confident. on the initiating, they maintain alluding to images they under no circumstances coach, and is meant to be partial "info" of assertions made for the little bit of imagery that they do coach. As to the undesirable high quality of the exterior pictures on the moon, those were taking with an outside fixed digital camera that were over-engineered to face up to a lot, probably with better thick glass, and in black and white because colour changed into nonetheless rather new on the time and they did not opt to probability it breaking down and under no circumstances getting the shot of Armstrong's descent down the ladder and onto the moon's floor. Shading the abode windows changed into no longer done so as no longer to smash their fake shot of the Earth, yet to dam the incoming solar to allow a sparkling shot of the Earth through the window. As all of us is easily-known with, once you try to be certain some thing outdoors your window at nighttime, you want to coach off the interior mild so that you do not see it obtrusive on the window. as a effect the solar reflecting off the interior walls can be a similar because the interior mild. the completed bit with the "crescent formed insert" and the digital camera supposedly being outdoors the pill... ludicrous. If a crescent formed insert changed into getting used, it may have a obviously defined area, which it would not. there is one shot the position they say the undeniable structure of the Earth is as a results of way it is being considered through a thick window, yet when that were the case, there is obtrusive distortion in the course of the face of the earth, and there is no longer. the actual shown actuality that they furnish 2 diverse factors for why the Earth appears no longer "finished", is fantastically suspicious by using itself. The "0.33 social gathering" preserving "communicate" interior the communication changed into only a instantaneous by using challenge administration to get them to say some thing. And the "cryptic statement" by using Armstrong to the scholars on the top, the position he says "we've only finished the initiating", is him preserving that Apollo changed into only the initiating of guy's journey to area, and the "undone" section is as a lot as destiny generations. i ought to bypass on in further component about how idiotic this video is, yet i'm drained and that i visit mattress. Goodnight.
2016-10-15 00:18:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
People think the US faked the moon landing in a rush to beat the USSR.
2006-07-20 05:05:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here are 2 great sites with opposing views but evidence to support both.
Hope this Helps! :0)
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm
2006-07-20 05:06:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by King of the Couch 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they do not trust their government (or any government) to tell them the truth and they do not believe what their mind cannot comprehend.
2006-07-20 05:04:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Raynanne 5
·
0⤊
0⤋