I'm a religious conservative. How can the Republicans ever think they represent me if they believe in the death penalty? They always say things like "we respect the sanctity of human life" when talking about abortion, then turn around and rally behind executing some helpless prisoner.
I am deeply opposed to needless, brutal executions. War is different - I will make that distinction right now. But executing a helpless prisoner, while viscerally satisfying, doesn't actually accomplish anything. I've read literally hundreds of articles, publications, and studies on the subject and the justifications just don't hold up to scrutiny.
The need for one person to have revenge on another cannot be justification in this matter. If it was, then we are teaching that vengeance is the proper response to being wronged. Which doesn't seem like a lesson I want to teach my children. For that matter, isn't that mentality of cyclical vengeance exactly what is causing problems in Lebanon?
2006-07-20
04:57:06
·
7 answers
·
asked by
OccumsRevelation
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
-- Andy and Nimbleminx, the prisoner is helpless to commit further acts against society. That's what I mean by 'helpless'. As such, punishing them further is akin to winning a war, then slaughtering the populace. You've already gotten the criminal off the streets and safely away from civilized society. Further, a lot of these people are mentally unbalanced, or knew very violent lives. Still others were likely innocent (at least a few of the executed turned out to be innocent beyond contention after the fact). Yes, there are some real monsters out there, but what good does it serve to kill them? The death penalty has been proven -conclusively- to have no deterrent effect on crime. If it did, I might agree with you. But it does not. So being opposed to crime (which I am) has nothing to do with supporting the death penalty (which I don't).
2006-07-20
05:17:14 ·
update #1