2006-07-20 03:58:52 · 10 answers · asked by amolrk1983 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Well leaving kumble out is one of the biggest mistakes the selectors are making. The selectors are leaving him out becasue he cant bat as well as a batsman. The selectors dont seem to seeing the fact that he is a excellent bowler. The main goal of the selectors must be to select a team that is balanced.
Balanced means 5 batsmen with some as part timers. 1 allrounder who is consistent in both bowling and batting and a good wicket keeper if he can bat it is an added advantage. and then 4 good bowlers whether they know how to hold the bat is immaterial.
The selectors concept of balanced side seems to be 11 batsmen with some bowling skills. That is why kumble has been droped. That has helped india win few matches but not many tournaments. If india needs to win the world cup then they need a balanced side and KUMBLE is a obvious choice for a bowler in the side. Leaving him does not send good signs to indian cricketers who are playing domestic cricket. Everybody will concetrate on batting and finally we will have no bowlers left only part time bowlers. If india loses badly in the up coming tri series then kumble would be brought in immediately if not india will retain a simialr side and that means world cup is not for india
2006-07-20 18:54:19 · answer #1 · answered by Immanuel Alwin 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As far is i am concerned anil is one of the best bowlers india have but he is not so effective in one day cricket and if he plays in both one day and test cricket he will not be fit and he cannot be effective in both test and one day cricket so i think the selectors are doing the right thing
2006-07-24 01:20:18 · answer #2 · answered by shyam 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it is a far greater honour to play for Surrey, even for a short while, than to continually play for India where he has already proved himself many times. Surrey are the greatest club side in world cricket, and he asked to be left out of the Indian side in order to allow him to play for Surrey.
2006-07-20 06:06:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hes not a godd one day player anyhow....he is a real good medium pacers...probably the best slow medium pacrs this world has ever see..he should pe included in the test side...as india already lacks bowling depth...but not in ODIs
2006-07-20 16:46:41 · answer #4 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Politics play a great role there
2006-07-20 04:02:04 · answer #5 · answered by king 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
aged over
2006-07-20 18:24:25 · answer #6 · answered by corrona 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cuz he cant ran after ball, cant bat and may be cant pay
CHAI PANI
to selectors
2006-07-20 04:05:49 · answer #7 · answered by cuz he will die soon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he is not a very good batsman in my opinion.......he need to work on his hand eye coordination..........
2006-07-20 12:32:11 · answer #8 · answered by nikaloferanti 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
by expiration
2006-07-23 15:29:29 · answer #9 · answered by Sri Lankan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because of his injury
2006-07-20 08:56:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋