Do you think the same logic can be applied to the Lebanese who are having their children killed by the bombs of the Israeli's. I dont know if its true but they are quoting a figure of a third of the deaths of civilians so far have been children.
If the logic is yes to that , would it then follow that any indisrcriminate bombing where people cannot get justice will lead to more terrorist violence.
2006-07-20 03:34:22 · 9 answers · asked by dopeysaurus 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I would like to add that I do not agree with any of the bombing in the middle east at the moment, I only want to see how close we can get to the emotional processes that make people want to seek revenge
2006-07-20 04:06:00 · update #1
When you seek retribution for how they have grievously wronged you - say like having your child raped and murdered as you stated previously - you seek it on the relevant person or people. Indiscriminate killing of more innocents is unspeakably ridiculous and only breeds further violence. Both sides of this conflict are unjustified in their actions. Nuff said.
2006-07-20 03:47:51 · answer #1 · answered by Disgruntled Biscuit 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is little logic in what is happening in the war in Lebanon. Both sides in this war are killing Innocent children. However any death is both sad and predictable. Bombs fall and anyone near is hit. Right or wrong war is tragic. It shows man at its worst. However terrorists have to be beaten and that will cost lives. How about the children in Africa who die every day because the rich countries of the world will not give a little more. The die of starvation when Europe has food mountains we will never need. We have the technology to give them all clean water and a sewerage system. So it doe's not take bombs to kill innocent children greed and selfish governments without a bomb.
2006-07-20 03:44:28 · answer #2 · answered by deadly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In war the hardest thing to belive are the facts after an event.
You cant judge an action of retribution following provocation (kidnap, bombing etc from hezbullah).
The Lebanese people may not have asked for these terrorists to hide-out in their back yard, but they haven't asked them to leave either. This is known as the harboring of terrorists, and is a justification for hawks to press ahead with counter-measures.
thats another logic I suppose.
Really the question to ask is who is pushing these terrorist groups (there is an argument that clandestine US funding is creating a quasi force that can be easily crushed by the more powerful friends in Israel) into such brazren manouvres.
Who stands to gain from instability in the reigon?
I'll let you anwser that one.
2006-07-20 04:17:26 · answer #3 · answered by creamanglaise 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If terrorists or their weapons hide behind children and civilians, should we spare them .Even after they warned them to get out of the way ,its their choice to stay and protect their terrorists. Note: in this war Hezbollah is firing indiscriminately at civilians,the bombs themselves have sharp objects to tear into the victim ,for years Israel has put up with Islamic terrorists blowing up buses, suicide bombings ,etc men women and children were killed -innocent civilians maybe your sympathy is a little misplaced.
2006-07-20 03:58:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The lebanese should have thought twice before allowing Hezbollah to camp out in their country.
Collateral damage is a sad fact of war.
But let me ask you, Islamic supporter or possibly extremist, should Israel just sit back and be constantly hammered by terror groups?
2006-07-20 03:43:50 · answer #5 · answered by Munster 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are right. The cycle of killing will continue and more children will be blown to bits and no-one will care because the USA supports the Israelis and give them justification for their atrocities.
2006-07-20 03:38:41 · answer #6 · answered by Roxy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no they live in country were they do not stand up to the bombers and give them shelter what are the rest of us todo let them no when we are coming after them so they can get away they should kick them out then they may have a chance for peace
2006-07-20 03:41:18 · answer #7 · answered by Bruce k 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with system_of_ch but even so if I knew who the bomber was I would still take the law in my own hands
2006-07-20 03:39:59 · answer #8 · answered by pikapoke_uk 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its two different things.....One is war...that happens in war, regardless of who gets killed, that is the saddest part of war but its still a part.
2006-07-20 03:37:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋