2006-07-20 03:31:55 · 6 answers · asked by satish_kone 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
I can find nothing wrong with the sentence. INsurmountable and UNsurmountable can be exchanged. ^_^
2006-07-20 03:54:45 · answer #1 · answered by T M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When seen clearly Jesus said about the same thing that all the other great religious leaders said. His insights were profound. The viewpoints of Thomas Jefferson and others are why the country was set up to prevent Theocracy. To fight Communism the US government gave far more credit to superficial religion than was wise and pays for it today in spirituality. Still the contrast between truth and fundamentalism finds fundamentalism lacking. Our latest national sins are fought at the insistence of domestic fundamentalism against foreign fundamentalism. Let us hope we turn with as much enthusiasm against our own fundamentalism. It's not a certainty that we will be kinder to our own fundamentalist if we do discover that they are of less political value in the future than they are now. Still they are allowed the illusion that they determine the course of the nation in matters not in competition with corporate interest. Even Pat Robertson owns stock.
2016-03-27 00:54:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Try again. What will become insurmountable if negligence is abetted by what leaders?
2006-07-20 03:35:41 · answer #3 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's usually "insurmountable" instead of "unsurmountable" but it's essentially correct.
2006-07-20 03:38:06 · answer #4 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are implying that the 'leaders' are actively encouraging the negligence and not just being negligent themselves. If this is what you are trying to say then your sentance is fine
2006-07-20 04:09:25 · answer #5 · answered by well_clever_i_am 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
FOR THEM.
2006-07-20 03:33:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋