Wolf Creek
i thought it was going to be soooo scary but it was a joke...! pretty much all the good parts are in the previews (that's about how long they lasted too!) the beginning of the movie was just BORING! it was like a documentary and by the time they got to the end (the good parts that last like 15 minutes, maybe 20) you were ready to go (or asleep like i was about to do)... it was a waste of 6.50 at the theater...
if you haven't seen it yet, save your money and see anything else! you will thank me later...
2006-07-20 02:35:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Fatty McButterpants 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
The current King Kong is truly the worst big box office "blockbuster" ever. Perhaps the 70lb weight loss that Peter Jackson, the director of this movie and great ones, like "Lord of the Rings" after the Lord of the Rings trilogy was in his brain.
The movie was totally miscast, the script leaving much to be desired and the characters unlikeable.
2006-07-20 02:07:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by bottleblondemama 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Silent Hill--too much hype, the movie itself wasn't scary.
Hostel--purported to be the "scariest" horror film of the last decade--turns out it is just the longest (yawn) or so it felt like it.
Saw 1 & 2. Borrrrrring.
Blair Witch--there's two hours of my life I'll never get back. The scariest part of this film is when they run out of cigarettes. Seriously.
Gladiator--Too long, and too predictable. TOTAL cheese. Sorry, Russel Crowe just isn't attractive enough for me to endorse this crappy flick.
Anything by Tom Cruise...but then I don't wait to see anything by Tom Cruise, so I guess that doesn't count. The only good film TC was in, was Rainman. It's all been downhill from there.
2006-07-20 02:10:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Carrie S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually I have two. I am a major Nicolas Cage fan, I was really pumped up to see Lord of War when it came out, man was I so disappointed. The when The Weather Man came out, I was thinking, "Ok, so he had one bad movie, this one has to be better, Right?" boy was I wrong. I just hope he doesn't let me down in Ghost Rider.
2006-07-20 02:12:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Imajica 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've never waited on a movie to come out acept Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest, and I enjoyed that one. Oh wait, no. I take that back. Harry Potter three and four were huge dissapointments to me. It was practically a whole different thing from the book. Just the same plot and characters.
2006-07-20 02:02:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Akarui 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good Question, and without a doubt the movie 'Vanilla Sky' starring heavyweights like Tom Cruise, Cameron Diaz, Kurt Russell and Penelope Cruz SHOULD HAVE BEEN a great movie, but it stunk so bad i could hardly believe what i was watching.
2006-07-20 02:14:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by sunshine25 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree the movie could of been better, but overall i thought it was kinda cool...only parts i didn't like were the gigantic insects and them running with the dinosaurs...and they never showed how they got Kong on the boat or how he got to the main land lol...it's like he magically got there through osmosis
2006-07-20 02:02:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Maestro 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Im sure there are a lot, but most recent.... The Hills Have Eyes. It was soooo not scary, and the blood and gore in it in some parts was so intense that it seemed too fake and over the top.
2006-07-20 02:02:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Break - Up I thought I was going to be a lot funnier than that. They showed all the good parts in the commercials.
2006-07-20 02:12:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by tre_wingo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Harry Potter an dthe cup of thingy or whatever it was. I had to wait for it for my son, but it was a bitter dissapointment. Purile mind numbing pap from the source of all nonsence..... Hollywood.
2006-07-20 02:03:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by mike_ra_swanson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋