the reason that other nations are not joining is the fear of escalation if they do. remember, this is not a fight between two autonomous nations, its between a nation and a terrorist organization; this was inevitable but came sooner than expected.
So you better put down your tea and crumpets and get your facts straight. We need to see both sides of the issue before taking action. We don't want World War III. At least, I don't want WWIII.
And I'm pretty certain you don't want it either. Recall what happened to your country in the last one.
2006-07-20 00:52:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tarvold 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ya. 500,000 Yanks committed genocide in WW II to save Europe.
We also knew we would be next, lest you think I'm ignorant of reality.
I am thankful that not all in UK feel that way towards us. I loved my visits to UK. Rest assured we will be there if you ever need us again.
Cheerio! From a Yank.
2006-07-20 07:54:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by ed 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why would you say that about yanks? And aren't the days of yanks and rebels over? Like 200 years ago? One counrty.
2006-07-20 07:49:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by spider 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Icy indifference to the plight of others isn't an exclusive trait of "Yanks".
And if we've mangled our attempts at empire-building, well gosh...Rule Britannia set us such a charming example.
2006-07-20 07:50:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by St. Hell 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even the weak, in their hey day, want to kill others, to protect themselves. Self negation is a concept non-existent in international politics. Even in Gandhi's life time, India went to war with Pak. I wish Gandhi lived long enough, to experiment with non-violence, in dealings with other countries.
2006-07-20 07:53:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since when are the Yanks up for genocide? How dare you.
2006-07-20 07:48:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It appears the leaders of most countries are happy to sit back and watch the slaughter.
2006-07-20 07:47:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
oooh i'm up for it.
EXCEPT: i define genocide as the elimination of a group of people BELOW A CERTAIN IQ VALUE. i don't know if that counts..... :)
2006-07-20 07:54:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by visionary 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Must be military in the third.
2006-07-20 07:49:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by SLOWTHINKER 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
so many people to slaughter, so little time
2006-07-20 07:52:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Meymun Beg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋